From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-385720-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 19495 invoked by alias); 25 Nov 2014 08:46:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 19478 invoked by uid 89); 25 Nov 2014 08:46:27 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-qg0-f51.google.com
Received: from mail-qg0-f51.google.com (HELO mail-qg0-f51.google.com) (209.85.192.51) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 08:46:26 +0000
Received: by mail-qg0-f51.google.com with SMTP id l89so62048qgf.38        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 00:46:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date         :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;        bh=ZNdrIFoBnI2LAnBg4Hf8maxzXWdJ1r4mTHFiDso5eac=;        b=EQZhYz0E64hg1jlZIvnT2SQgjdyMhiJkI2jfte6mEaHcklVoNnaBbrObguQ2GpeTss         LZskr1Cciv36NUkgTHsTb1o8vKBs5a3DKLp8px2p47uuoWS7GtGKNP0YE+b56ZmarSE3         aDL+79ijafqYnbxFuLhaB41Z55m0iRECPb1bLVH1zSCVNcUejlItlWGfxvtpGtKXmcvr         Xbdv/hkHuLqdV8NsbbYoOKcae7RzSmvkP6Qt7caHm8itEQCs1j6SSg2e7DrcVhEScBHp         l3dE82x6rt/ahRwkixQ2pNpQ5DiedTM35xlNl4vQhGOibAqsi7/XkL9ZLqLfpnBh7xm/         Mt8w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkiN4TqxvLVA46t1tNiOt0NpXa8bKTIjfa0CRaVeSBEXUJJu3F3l1NoE9qVW8Qurd2eLTvO
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.224.137.198 with SMTP id x6mr35885052qat.11.1416905184443; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 00:46:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.96.254.231 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Nov 2014 00:46:24 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAG4ZjN=L=BgFQM3JOLMi0Gm3UdbXohvis_Ts5LtHJ-KjW1QzwQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPrifDnmuZRTV-Z5tpa=tr=RfBMkyPL4nXjr7C9EFef_WiJ_aA@mail.gmail.com>	<20141110183246.GC5191@redhat.com>	<CAG4ZjN=L=BgFQM3JOLMi0Gm3UdbXohvis_Ts5LtHJ-KjW1QzwQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 09:24:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAG4ZjNk1rCXABPQJDpWv8eLLiG+7w93PmaFiNhpcpVEcJ7Pebg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch, libstdc++/63775] Fix regex bracket expression parsing
From: Tim Shen <timshen@google.com>
To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
Cc: "libstdc++" <libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-SW-Source: 2014-11/txt/msg03099.txt.bz2

On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 11:45 PM, Tim Shen <timshen@google.com> wrote:
> Committed with comment fix and slight change on testcase
> (VERIFY(false) at end of the try block ------ must throw).

Is it possible to backport this patch to 4.9 branch? It's an important
fix, but I'm not sure if there's any binary compatibility problem. Is
it fine because it's only _Compiler class, which is an intermediate
class, that's modified?


-- 
Regards,
Tim Shen