From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-396709-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 92832 invoked by alias); 2 May 2015 17:34:54 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 92812 invoked by uid 89); 2 May 2015 17:34:53 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients
X-HELO: mail-la0-f51.google.com
Received: from mail-la0-f51.google.com (HELO mail-la0-f51.google.com) (209.85.215.51) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Sat, 02 May 2015 17:34:52 +0000
Received: by labbd9 with SMTP id bd9so81277943lab.2;        Sat, 02 May 2015 10:34:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.205.225 with SMTP id lj1mr12677637lbc.27.1430588089234; Sat, 02 May 2015 10:34:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.25.42.203 with HTTP; Sat, 2 May 2015 10:34:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20150502171433.GB3618@redhat.com>
References: <20150502171433.GB3618@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 02 May 2015 17:34:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAGNvRgDqyprOL42ZaijNPhisPSRcdRhA7VaXeGispihM6A0K4g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] std::experimental::ostream_joiner
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Daniel_Kr=FCgler?= <daniel.kruegler@gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
Cc: "libstdc++" <libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org>, gcc-patches List <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg00147.txt.bz2

2015-05-02 19:14 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>:
> The last piece of the Library Fundamentals 2 TS (until next week when
> all of v1 gets voted into v2, when it will include the v1 stuff we're
> missing).
>
> Tested powerpc64le-linux, committed to trunk.

Do you really want to copy the ugliness of the Standard specification
for in-class members or could this be made more readable as follows
(affects four members):

ostream_joiner<_DelimT, _CharT, _Traits>&
=>
ostream_joiner&

? [I'm asking because I have not seen this to be the general style
used in libstdc++]

- Daniel