From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21202 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2012 13:25:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 21193 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Nov 2012 13:25:43 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-lb0-f175.google.com (HELO mail-lb0-f175.google.com) (209.85.217.175) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Nov 2012 13:25:10 +0000 Received: by mail-lb0-f175.google.com with SMTP id gg13so4344018lbb.20 for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2012 05:25:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.152.106.110 with SMTP id gt14mr3497965lab.1.1353677109283; Fri, 23 Nov 2012 05:25:09 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.135.105 with HTTP; Fri, 23 Nov 2012 05:24:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <50AF7893.6050407@net-b.de> References: <50AA7E29.9060808@net-b.de> <50AF5DA3.9040803@net-b.de> <50AF7893.6050407@net-b.de> From: Konstantin Serebryany Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 13:25:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [wwwdocs] Mention -faddress-sanitizer in gcc-4.8/changes.html To: Tobias Burnus Cc: gcc patches , Dodji Seketeli , Gerald Pfeifer Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg01927.txt.bz2 On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Tobias Burnus wrote: > Konstantin Serebryany wrote: >> >> Looks good. > > > And now available at http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.8/changes.html Cool! > > >>> Notes: I didn't mention Sparc, PowerPC, and Darwin >> >> Darwin works fine with clang, but not yet in gcc. > > > I know =96 and actually it is a bit unclear to me what's the review statu= s of > Jack Howarth's patch. I think it needs the LICENSE file (mach_override has a separate license). > > >> at least simple tests for stack- and global- buffer overflows seem to >> work. > > > I think the man page should be then updated. man page? > (I think it used to mention > stack and global buffer overflow; in any case, the the current version > doesn't.) > > Tobias