From: David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>
To: HAO CHEN GUI <guihaoc@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>,
"Kewen.Lin" <linkw@linux.ibm.com>,
Peter Bergner <bergner@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH-2, rs6000] Enable vector mode for memory equality compare [PR111449]
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2023 11:42:07 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGWvny=2AHOcH7u__C2OYAkF-CNZR=m_aKREcKej41aVFOnaEQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aa42d6bc-151e-515b-81a6-d08925c047ac@linux.ibm.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5678 bytes --]
On Sun, Oct 8, 2023 at 10:30 PM HAO CHEN GUI <guihaoc@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> This patch enables vector mode for memory equality compare by adding
> a new expand cbranchv16qi4 and implementing it. Also the corresponding
> CC reg and compare code is set in rs6000_generate_compare. With the
> patch, 16-byte equality compare can be implemented by one vector compare
> instructions other than 2 8-byte compares with branches.
>
> The test case is in the second patch which is rs6000 specific.
>
> Bootstrapped and tested on powerpc64-linux BE and LE with no
> regressions.
>
Thanks for working on this.
>
> Thanks
> Gui Haochen
>
> ChangeLog
> rs6000: Enable vector compare for memory equality compare
>
> gcc/
> PR target/111449
> * config/rs6000/altivec.md (cbranchv16qi4): New expand pattern.
> * config/rs6000/rs6000.cc (rs6000_generate_compare): Generate insn
> sequence for V16QImode equality compare.
> * config/rs6000/rs6000.h (MOVE_MAX_PIECES): Define.
> (COMPARE_MAX_PIECES): Define.
>
> gcc/testsuite/
> PR target/111449
> * gcc.target/powerpc/pr111449.c: New.
>
> patch.diff
> diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/altivec.md b/gcc/config/rs6000/altivec.md
> index e8a596fb7e9..c69bf266402 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/rs6000/altivec.md
> +++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/altivec.md
> @@ -2605,6 +2605,39 @@ (define_insn "altivec_vupklpx"
> }
> [(set_attr "type" "vecperm")])
>
> +(define_expand "cbranchv16qi4"
> + [(use (match_operator 0 "equality_operator"
> + [(match_operand:V16QI 1 "gpc_reg_operand")
> + (match_operand:V16QI 2 "gpc_reg_operand")]))
> + (use (match_operand 3))]
> + "VECTOR_UNIT_ALTIVEC_P (V16QImode)"
> +{
> + if (!TARGET_P9_VECTOR
> + && MEM_P (operands[1])
> + && !altivec_indexed_or_indirect_operand (operands[1], V16QImode)
> + && MEM_P (operands[2])
> + && !altivec_indexed_or_indirect_operand (operands[2], V16QImode))
> + {
> + /* Use direct move as the byte order doesn't matter for equality
> + compare. */
> + rtx reg_op1 = gen_reg_rtx (V16QImode);
> + rtx reg_op2 = gen_reg_rtx (V16QImode);
> + rs6000_emit_le_vsx_permute (reg_op1, operands[1], V16QImode);
> + rs6000_emit_le_vsx_permute (reg_op2, operands[2], V16QImode);
> + operands[1] = reg_op1;
> + operands[2] = reg_op2;
> + }
> + else
> + {
> + operands[1] = force_reg (V16QImode, operands[1]);
> + operands[2] = force_reg (V16QImode, operands[2]);
> + }
> + rtx_code code = GET_CODE (operands[0]);
> + operands[0] = gen_rtx_fmt_ee (code, V16QImode, operands[1],
> operands[2]);
> + rs6000_emit_cbranch (V16QImode, operands);
> + DONE;
> +})
> +
> ;; Compare vectors producing a vector result and a predicate, setting CR6
> to
> ;; indicate a combined status
> (define_insn "altivec_vcmpequ<VI_char>_p"
> diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc
> index efe9adce1f8..0087d786840 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc
> +++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc
> @@ -15264,6 +15264,15 @@ rs6000_generate_compare (rtx cmp, machine_mode
> mode)
> else
> emit_insn (gen_stack_protect_testsi (compare_result, op0,
> op1b));
> }
> + else if (mode == V16QImode)
> + {
> + gcc_assert (code == EQ || code == NE);
> +
> + rtx result_vector = gen_reg_rtx (V16QImode);
> + compare_result = gen_rtx_REG (CCmode, CR6_REGNO);
> + emit_insn (gen_altivec_vcmpequb_p (result_vector, op0, op1));
> + code = (code == NE) ? GE : LT;
> + }
> else
> emit_insn (gen_rtx_SET (compare_result,
> gen_rtx_COMPARE (comp_mode, op0, op1)));
> diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.h b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.h
> index 3503614efbd..dc33bca0802 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.h
> +++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.h
> @@ -1730,6 +1730,8 @@ typedef struct rs6000_args
> in one reasonably fast instruction. */
> #define MOVE_MAX (! TARGET_POWERPC64 ? 4 : 8)
> #define MAX_MOVE_MAX 8
> +#define MOVE_MAX_PIECES (!TARGET_POWERPC64 ? 4 : 16)
> +#define COMPARE_MAX_PIECES (!TARGET_POWERPC64 ? 4 : 16)
>
How are the definitions of MOVE_MAX_PIECES and COMPARE_MAX_PIECES
determined? The email does not provide any explanation for the
implementation. The rest of the patch is related to vector support, but
vector support is not dependent on TARGET_POWERPC64.
Thanks, David
>
> /* Nonzero if access to memory by bytes is no faster than for words.
> Also nonzero if doing byte operations (specifically shifts) in
> registers
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr111449.c
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr111449.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..a8c30b92a41
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr111449.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_p8vector_ok } */
> +/* { dg-options "-maltivec -O2" } */
> +/* { dg-require-effective-target has_arch_ppc64 } */
> +
> +/* Ensure vector comparison is used for 16-byte memory equality compare.
> */
> +
> +int compare1 (const char* s1, const char* s2)
> +{
> + return __builtin_memcmp (s1, s2, 16) == 0;
> +}
> +
> +int compare2 (const char* s1)
> +{
> + return __builtin_memcmp (s1, "0123456789012345", 16) == 0;
> +}
> +
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mvcmpequb\.} 2 } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {\mcmpd\M} } } */
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-09 15:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-09 2:30 HAO CHEN GUI
2023-10-09 15:42 ` David Edelsohn [this message]
2023-10-10 8:18 ` HAO CHEN GUI
2023-10-10 12:44 ` David Edelsohn
2023-10-11 9:10 ` HAO CHEN GUI
2023-10-17 2:19 ` Kewen.Lin
2023-10-19 8:39 ` HAO CHEN GUI
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAGWvny=2AHOcH7u__C2OYAkF-CNZR=m_aKREcKej41aVFOnaEQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=dje.gcc@gmail.com \
--cc=bergner@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=guihaoc@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linkw@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).