From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 49206 invoked by alias); 19 Aug 2015 19:37:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 49170 invoked by uid 89); 19 Aug 2015 19:37:13 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-ig0-f170.google.com Received: from mail-ig0-f170.google.com (HELO mail-ig0-f170.google.com) (209.85.213.170) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 19:37:12 +0000 Received: by igbjg10 with SMTP id jg10so112969457igb.0 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 12:37:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.85.45 with SMTP id e13mr3618453igz.52.1440013030242; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 12:37:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.133.5 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 12:37:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <55D4DA0B.6000106@ubuntu.com> References: <55D39752.5090602@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <55D4DA0B.6000106@ubuntu.com> Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 19:42:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] PR66870 PowerPC64 Enable gold linker with split stack From: David Edelsohn To: Matthias Klose Cc: "Lynn A. Boger" , gcc-patches , Ian Taylor , Alan Modra Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-SW-Source: 2015-08/txt/msg01130.txt.bz2 On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: > why keep the old behaviour for other archs that have split stack support? Is it > really necessary to make this dependent on the target? I'm still using an > unreviewed/unpinged patch to enable gold for gccgo (attached). I much prefer your patch. Thanks, David