From: David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>
To: Bill Schmidt <wschmidt@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] rs6000: Rename functions with "new" in their names
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 13:08:48 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGWvny=S3QJSM+tcsAWS9YcsfgN-3_KPc62o0wVv307qY5tQSw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <26cd500407b755e6c04b6ab045ad65e5dcebcd69.1638820430.git.wschmidt@linux.ibm.com>
On Mon, Dec 6, 2021 at 3:49 PM Bill Schmidt <wschmidt@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> While we had two sets of built-in functionality at the same time, I put "new"
> in the names of quite a few functions. Time to undo that.
>
> Bootstrapped and tested on powerpc64le-linux-gnu with no regressions. Is this
> okay for trunk?
>
> Thanks!
> Bill
>
> 2021-12-02 Bill Schmidt <wschmidt@linux.ibm.com>
>
> gcc/
> * config/rs6000/rs6000-c.c (altivec_resolve_new_overloaded_builtin):
> Remove forward declaration.
> (rs6000_new_builtin_type_compatible): Rename to
> rs6000_builtin_type_compatible.
> (rs6000_builtin_type_compatible): Remove.
> (altivec_resolve_overloaded_builtin): Remove.
> (altivec_build_new_resolved_builtin): Rename to
> altivec_build_resolved_builtin.
> (altivec_resolve_new_overloaded_builtin): Rename to
> altivec_resolve_overloaded_builtin. Remove static keyword. Adjust
> called function names.
> * config/rs6000/rs6000-call.c (rs6000_expand_new_builtin): Remove
> forward declaration.
> (rs6000_gimple_fold_new_builtin): Likewise.
> (rs6000_invalid_new_builtin): Rename to rs6000_invalid_builtin.
> (rs6000_gimple_fold_builtin): Remove.
> (rs6000_new_builtin_valid_without_lhs): Rename to
> rs6000_builtin_valid_without_lhs.
> (rs6000_new_builtin_is_supported): Rename to
> rs6000_builtin_is_supported.
> (rs6000_gimple_fold_new_mma_builtin): Rename to
> rs6000_gimple_fold_mma_builtin.
> (rs6000_gimple_fold_new_builtin): Rename to
> rs6000_gimple_fold_builtin. Remove static keyword. Adjust called
> function names.
> (rs6000_expand_builtin): Remove.
> (new_cpu_expand_builtin): Rename to cpu_expand_builtin.
> (new_mma_expand_builtin): Rename to mma_expand_builtin.
> (new_htm_spr_num): Rename to htm_spr_num.
> (new_htm_expand_builtin): Rename to htm_expand_builtin. Change name
> of called function.
> (rs6000_expand_new_builtin): Rename to rs6000_expand_builtin. Remove
> static keyword. Adjust called function names.
> (rs6000_new_builtin_decl): Rename to rs6000_builtin_decl. Remove
> static keyword.
> (rs6000_builtin_decl): Remove.
> * config/rs6000/rs6000-gen-builtins.c (write_decls): In gnerated code,
> rename rs6000_new_builtin_is_supported to rs6000_builtin_is_supported.
> * config/rs6000/rs6000-internal.h (rs6000_invalid_new_builtin): Rename
> to rs6000_invalid_builtin.
> * config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_new_builtin_vectorized_function):
> Rename to rs6000_builtin_vectorized_function.
> (rs6000_new_builtin_md_vectorized_function): Rename to
> rs6000_builtin_md_vectorized_function.
> (rs6000_builtin_vectorized_function): Remove.
> (rs6000_builtin_md_vectorized_function): Remove.
Okay.
Thanks, David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-14 18:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-06 20:49 [PATCH v2 0/6] Remove "old" built-in function infrastructure Bill Schmidt
2021-12-06 20:49 ` [PATCH 1/6] rs6000: Remove new_builtins_are_live and dead code it was guarding Bill Schmidt
2021-12-07 1:09 ` Segher Boessenkool
2021-12-06 20:49 ` [PATCH 2/6] rs6000: Remove altivec_overloaded_builtins array and initialization Bill Schmidt
2021-12-14 17:57 ` [PATCH v2 " Bill Schmidt
2021-12-14 18:04 ` [PATCH " David Edelsohn
2021-12-06 20:49 ` [PATCH 3/6] rs6000: Rename rs6000-builtin-new.def to rs6000-builtins.def Bill Schmidt
2021-12-14 18:00 ` [PATCH v2 " Bill Schmidt
2021-12-14 18:05 ` [PATCH " David Edelsohn
2021-12-06 20:49 ` [PATCH 4/6] rs6000: Remove rs6000-builtin.def and associated data and functions Bill Schmidt
2021-12-14 18:00 ` [PATCH v2 " Bill Schmidt
2021-12-14 18:08 ` [PATCH " David Edelsohn
2021-12-06 20:49 ` [PATCH 5/6] rs6000: Rename functions with "new" in their names Bill Schmidt
2021-12-14 18:01 ` [PATCH v2 /6] " Bill Schmidt
2021-12-14 18:08 ` David Edelsohn [this message]
2021-12-06 20:49 ` [PATCH 6/6] rs6000: Rename arrays to remove temporary _x suffix Bill Schmidt
2021-12-14 18:01 ` [PATCH v2 " Bill Schmidt
2021-12-14 18:10 ` [PATCH " David Edelsohn
2021-12-14 17:32 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] Remove "old" built-in function infrastructure Bill Schmidt
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-12-03 18:22 [PATCH 0/6] rs6000: " Bill Schmidt
2021-12-03 18:22 ` [PATCH 5/6] rs6000: Rename functions with "new" in their names Bill Schmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAGWvny=S3QJSM+tcsAWS9YcsfgN-3_KPc62o0wVv307qY5tQSw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=dje.gcc@gmail.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=wschmidt@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).