From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-381218-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 9728 invoked by alias); 21 Oct 2014 00:16:31 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 9709 invoked by uid 89); 21 Oct 2014 00:16:28 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-yh0-f48.google.com
Received: from mail-yh0-f48.google.com (HELO mail-yh0-f48.google.com) (209.85.213.48) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 00:16:27 +0000
Received: by mail-yh0-f48.google.com with SMTP id v1so215714yhn.7        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 17:16:24 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.26.82 with SMTP id j18mr22307658vdg.26.1413850584834; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 17:16:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.73.193 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 17:16:24 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.1410201754070.7896@tp.orcam.me.uk>
References: <CAGWvnynX3eEXqX4pCRx_a1iR-zRQafMMG687jdgJPmWo+hztUA@mail.gmail.com>	<CAGWvny=FJR61ZWQsMOhJxv2OSnAgpCYVt2pDWSchiU-izArzdA@mail.gmail.com>	<Pine.LNX.4.64.1408011526020.12217@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>	<53E28E53.2000009@linux.vnet.ibm.com>	<53F38135.9070604@linux.vnet.ibm.com>	<5406433B.3030703@linux.vnet.ibm.com>	<alpine.DEB.1.10.1409031436470.27075@tp.orcam.me.uk>	<5408B22B.8050804@linux.vnet.ibm.com>	<alpine.DEB.1.10.1409151535540.27075@tp.orcam.me.uk>	<alpine.DEB.1.10.1410201754070.7896@tp.orcam.me.uk>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 00:26:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAGWvnykksW0c=F9-4_1=P6NnKnRbnZScQtrhaUe82wG-HFVBFQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PING][PATCH] GCC/test: Set timeout factor for c11-atomic-exec-5.c
From: David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@codesourcery.com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, 	Adhemerval Zanella <azanella@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-SW-Source: 2014-10/txt/msg01993.txt.bz2

On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Maciej W. Rozycki
<macro@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>  I thought http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg00242.html would
> be folded into PowerPC TARGET_ATOMIC_ASSIGN_EXPAND_FENV support, but I see
> r216437 went without it.  In that case would someone please review my
> proposal as a separate change?

The patch seems like a kludge work-around. Joseph suggested that full
support will require a newer GLIBC and detection in GCC.

Thanks, David