From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-403878-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 8018 invoked by alias); 25 Jul 2015 01:29:14 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 8006 invoked by uid 89); 25 Jul 2015 01:29:13 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-ig0-f176.google.com
Received: from mail-ig0-f176.google.com (HELO mail-ig0-f176.google.com) (209.85.213.176) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Sat, 25 Jul 2015 01:29:12 +0000
Received: by igbij6 with SMTP id ij6so27045186igb.1        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 18:29:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.25.167 with SMTP id d7mr1574329igg.59.1437787750536; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 18:29:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.36.108.21 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 18:29:10 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <ormvyl2uji.fsf@livre.home>
References: <orwpzcv2a2.fsf@livre.home>	<CAFiYyc38hY5jfVx-92f1i2aZKMVynPt1YrdWCObX3T45a_2V3Q@mail.gmail.com>	<ork2u0imrg.fsf@free.home>	<CAFiYyc1FQkwXDo0pKXkLmc-pgN9zAG2_+ru0TQsVQRWgVUqR1w@mail.gmail.com>	<ory4ifhkkg.fsf@free.home>	<ora8ut3oh6.fsf@livre.home>	<CAFiYyc3Dq3CycGg=YoD+eCbSBkPUHfpG-o5OhBag4Da8L3SwTQ@mail.gmail.com>	<orio9cw10j.fsf@livre.home>	<CAFiYyc3k9xh_6RGbTdHYOJ-aEmUWVeFRoWy=YzCHFDNSdtTXCA@mail.gmail.com>	<orwpxqvqnp.fsf@livre.home>	<20150723203112.GB27818@gate.crashing.org>	<CAMe9rOpR+2gPxo0tKaRPtcML_Q4=r-_=9iqk+_JZFPkM=eN=BQ@mail.gmail.com>	<CAMe9rOpbLEyDexVJqJAFJ3W6o4AktNog-jwk2CY4GZkrmT+nfA@mail.gmail.com>	<CAGWvny=phfwrxBpwdvDJ0G_Y0ZuTC2dJEe0LMGxsb62M25__vA@mail.gmail.com>	<ormvyl2uji.fsf@livre.home>
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2015 02:37:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAGWvnym+UY0VYmmxWmgLiYbqZfCYc6D7g0g9iNpkL91htKEwYw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PR64164] drop copyrename, integrate into expand
From: David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>
To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
Cc: Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>, Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>, 	Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, 	Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org>, Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com>, 	"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-SW-Source: 2015-07/txt/msg02139.txt.bz2

On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Jul 23, 2015, David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I request that this patch be reverted (again).
>
> Might I kindly ask you to please do so for me.  I've just found out
> that, after yesterday's memory upgrade on my local build machine, the
> filesystem that I normally use for GCC development got corrupted, and I
> don't want to mess with it before running an fsck which will take me a
> while.

I have reverted the patch.

- David