From: David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>
Cc: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@codesourcery.com>,
GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
Adhemerval Zanella <azanella@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PING][PATCH] GCC/test: Set timeout factor for c11-atomic-exec-5.c
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 02:15:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGWvnym4xgTm8fTdui0u6119Hh1qVc6baKP78D5Ka30nUztkww@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1410210024000.30508@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 8:26 PM, Joseph S. Myers
<joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Oct 2014, David Edelsohn wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Maciej W. Rozycki
>> <macro@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I thought http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg00242.html would
>> > be folded into PowerPC TARGET_ATOMIC_ASSIGN_EXPAND_FENV support, but I see
>> > r216437 went without it. In that case would someone please review my
>> > proposal as a separate change?
>>
>> The patch seems like a kludge work-around. Joseph suggested that full
>> support will require a newer GLIBC and detection in GCC.
>
> No, it's support for soft-float and e500 in
> TARGET_ATOMIC_ASSIGN_EXPAND_FENV that will need that (along with libgcc
> changes to make libgcc's copies of the soft-fp functions into compat
> symbols when they are available in glibc). That's nothing to do with the
> timeout issue.
I can apply the patch, but I don't want to unilaterally decide to
change the timeout affecting all architectures.
Thanks, David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-21 2:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-16 20:33 [PATCH] PowerPC: Implement TARGET_ATOMIC_ASSIGN_EXPAND_FENV David Edelsohn
2014-08-01 3:28 ` David Edelsohn
2014-08-01 15:31 ` Joseph S. Myers
2014-08-06 20:21 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2014-08-19 16:54 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2014-09-02 22:23 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2014-09-03 14:01 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2014-09-03 15:49 ` Joseph S. Myers
2014-09-04 18:40 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2014-09-15 14:38 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2014-10-20 17:18 ` [PING][PATCH] GCC/test: Set timeout factor for c11-atomic-exec-5.c Maciej W. Rozycki
2014-10-21 0:26 ` David Edelsohn
2014-10-21 1:49 ` Joseph S. Myers
2014-10-21 2:15 ` David Edelsohn [this message]
2014-10-21 23:03 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2014-11-14 21:02 ` [PING^2][PATCH] " Maciej W. Rozycki
2014-11-17 10:06 ` Mike Stump
2014-11-18 16:48 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAGWvnym4xgTm8fTdui0u6119Hh1qVc6baKP78D5Ka30nUztkww@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dje.gcc@gmail.com \
--cc=azanella@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
--cc=macro@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).