From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 79246 invoked by alias); 11 May 2015 15:30:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 79181 invoked by uid 89); 11 May 2015 15:30:15 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-ie0-f177.google.com Received: from mail-ie0-f177.google.com (HELO mail-ie0-f177.google.com) (209.85.223.177) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 11 May 2015 15:30:14 +0000 Received: by iecmd7 with SMTP id md7so33072775iec.3 for ; Mon, 11 May 2015 08:30:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.43.97.130 with SMTP id ck2mr11308544icc.91.1431358211119; Mon, 11 May 2015 08:30:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.108.21 with HTTP; Mon, 11 May 2015 08:30:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 15:30:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] rs6000: Don't use gen_rlwinm From: David Edelsohn To: Segher Boessenkool Cc: GCC Patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg00947.txt.bz2 On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > The next patch will rename the "rlwinm" pattern (as well as the other patterns > that implement rlwinm, now unnamed). The only place that uses gen_rlwinm > (an expander) is better off expanding the separate operations separately. > Do so. > > Okay for trunk? > > > Segher > > > 2015-05-10 Segher Boessenkool > > * config/rs6000/rs6000.md (rs6000_adjust_atomic_subword): Use > gen_ashlsi3 and gen_andsi3 instead of gen_rlwinm. Okay. Thanks, David