From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-403849-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 55426 invoked by alias); 24 Jul 2015 19:12:06 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 55414 invoked by uid 89); 24 Jul 2015 19:12:05 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-ig0-f180.google.com
Received: from mail-ig0-f180.google.com (HELO mail-ig0-f180.google.com) (209.85.213.180) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 19:12:04 +0000
Received: by igbij6 with SMTP id ij6so24029368igb.1        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 12:12:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.59.148 with SMTP id z20mr10106367igq.77.1437765122287; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 12:12:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.36.108.21 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 12:12:02 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAMe9rOo+cjvW57srP483w+RXBFvdngnp3PMv+ZK=4xj9VdW-Ug@mail.gmail.com>
References: <orwpzcv2a2.fsf@livre.home>	<CAFiYyc38hY5jfVx-92f1i2aZKMVynPt1YrdWCObX3T45a_2V3Q@mail.gmail.com>	<ork2u0imrg.fsf@free.home>	<CAFiYyc1FQkwXDo0pKXkLmc-pgN9zAG2_+ru0TQsVQRWgVUqR1w@mail.gmail.com>	<ory4ifhkkg.fsf@free.home>	<ora8ut3oh6.fsf@livre.home>	<CAFiYyc3Dq3CycGg=YoD+eCbSBkPUHfpG-o5OhBag4Da8L3SwTQ@mail.gmail.com>	<orio9cw10j.fsf@livre.home>	<CAFiYyc3k9xh_6RGbTdHYOJ-aEmUWVeFRoWy=YzCHFDNSdtTXCA@mail.gmail.com>	<orwpxqvqnp.fsf@livre.home>	<20150723203112.GB27818@gate.crashing.org>	<CAMe9rOpR+2gPxo0tKaRPtcML_Q4=r-_=9iqk+_JZFPkM=eN=BQ@mail.gmail.com>	<CAMe9rOpbLEyDexVJqJAFJ3W6o4AktNog-jwk2CY4GZkrmT+nfA@mail.gmail.com>	<ory4i52y6o.fsf@livre.home>	<CAMe9rOo+cjvW57srP483w+RXBFvdngnp3PMv+ZK=4xj9VdW-Ug@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 19:31:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAGWvnymczrKOznJfO1bsR15mfmfoaNLzZL773Di+o5WbCPu8oA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PR64164] drop copyrename, integrate into expand
From: David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
Cc: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>, Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>, 	Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, 	Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org>, Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-SW-Source: 2015-07/txt/msg02110.txt.bz2

On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 3:10 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On Jul 23, 2015, "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66983
>>
>> My test logs with the patch have:
>>
>> PASS: c-c++-common/dfp/func-vararg-dfp.c execution test
>>
>> so I think this one is not caused by the PR64164 patch.
>
> I double checked.  r226113 failed and r226112 passed.

Alexandre,

Did you commit the final, complete version of the patches?

Did you test the version of the patches that you committed?

Thanks, David