From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-416398-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 95806 invoked by alias); 4 Dec 2015 14:46:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 95788 invoked by uid 89); 4 Dec 2015 14:46:02 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-lb0-f180.google.com
Received: from mail-lb0-f180.google.com (HELO mail-lb0-f180.google.com) (209.85.217.180) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 14:46:01 +0000
Received: by lbbed20 with SMTP id ed20so7374217lbb.2        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 06:45:58 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.150.135 with SMTP id ui7mr7296045lbb.53.1449240358353; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 06:45:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.114.62.230 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Dec 2015 06:45:58 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <2c10dc4d733427f3f85b219f8b9a49e3f5034bdd.1449238455.git.segher@kernel.crashing.org>
References: <ffa276b006562a0a3f54ce786b21d0e69dcfc258.1449238455.git.segher@kernel.crashing.org>	<2c10dc4d733427f3f85b219f8b9a49e3f5034bdd.1449238455.git.segher@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2015 14:46:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAGWvnymyX4Xv0+aokE=OFLixFziKaOiweEnJ=H9A1XjaGZHHGg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] rs6000: Clean up the cstore code a bit
From: David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>
To: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-SW-Source: 2015-12/txt/msg00574.txt.bz2

On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 9:34 AM, Segher Boessenkool
<segher@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> "register_operand" was a bit confusing.  Also some other minor cleanups.
>
> Tested on powerpc64-linux; okay for mainline?
>
>
> Segher
>
>
> 2015-12-04  Segher Boessenkool  <segher&kernel.crashing.org>
>
>         * (cstore<mode>4_unsigned): Use gpc_reg_operand instead of
>         register_operand.  Remove empty constraints.  Use std::swap.
>         (cstore_si_as_di, cstore<mode>4_signed_imm,
>         cstore<mode>4_unsigned_imm, cstore<mode>4 for GPR): Use
>         gpc_reg_operand instead of register_operand.
>         (cstore<mode>4 for FP): Use gpc_reg_operand instead of
>         register_operand.  Remove empty constraints.

Okay.

Thanks, David