From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 61414 invoked by alias); 22 Jan 2016 14:42:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 61402 invoked by uid 89); 22 Jan 2016 14:42:08 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=adjusts, restricts, Restrict X-HELO: mail-lf0-f44.google.com Received: from mail-lf0-f44.google.com (HELO mail-lf0-f44.google.com) (209.85.215.44) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 14:42:07 +0000 Received: by mail-lf0-f44.google.com with SMTP id 17so48295119lfz.1 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 06:42:07 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=CCIKe6gGNcc/C1av3fakj6KAPwgzKRqqtRBRtTdLISI=; b=i+ZWxkejzdtlqDLkTJu2/XkFcRcBSNzNOlKWH4q/A//gb0nYJjjTRISjQlslluYR2g rLT4MN/SjEl2mELWBG0HoTyKyBq6RcaztP6mAcFum0oAZy6s4r9gMx6rKdfv75mufP+q gUhRYjwmfXKe3HTZrTE7ymLpV9P340lkCDU84nydosHJIa6TGz6ANxucw8H345H5Y6sY BcrOH5TTjWPK8mcgyt+iRT2q80BgJ2h7VcAfzdQMM4nViDB7rau6295uArA5YscrCk2e NEpJTea4t0pP6SSumI3NgybwOeK0n1yKC3GvFgc2kPXC7CL9qnMowMAM5PPvuKm1BhFF jO2g== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YORmcOmyW61pLNlU1xxEUa9LjA6qVb10Ly7naEGWywMU4jqTQ95gt2lRacy5m7ITUL16BSJwwe4nwtvguw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.25.141.129 with SMTP id p123mr1145497lfd.65.1453473724132; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 06:42:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.80.200 with HTTP; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 06:42:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1453441360.20231.10.camel@gnopaine> References: <1453394918.22933.3.camel@gnopaine> <1453432887.20231.5.camel@gnopaine> <1453441360.20231.10.camel@gnopaine> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 14:42:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH, rs6000] Fix PR63354 From: David Edelsohn To: Bill Schmidt Cc: GCC Patches , Anton Blanchard Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-SW-Source: 2016-01/txt/msg01754.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 12:42 AM, Bill Schmidt wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 2016-01-21 at 21:21 -0600, Bill Schmidt wrote: >> The testcase will need a slight adjustment, as currently it fails on >> powerpc64 with -m32 testing. Working on a fix. >> >> Bill >> > > This patch adjusts the gcc.target/powerpc/pr63354 test to require 64-bit > code generation, and also restricts the test to Linux targets, as this > is necessary for using -mprofile-kernel. Tested on > powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu configured with --with-cpu=power7 and > testing with -m32; the test is now correctly skipped there. Is this > okay for trunk? > > Thanks, > Bill > > > 2016-01-22 Bill Schmidt > > * gcc.target/powerpc/pr63354.c: Restrict to Linux targets with > 64-bit support. Okay. Thanks, David