From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-332198-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 10906 invoked by alias); 19 Nov 2012 01:14:33 -0000
Received: (qmail 10878 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Nov 2012 01:14:31 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-vc0-f175.google.com (HELO mail-vc0-f175.google.com) (209.85.220.175)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 01:14:27 +0000
Received: by mail-vc0-f175.google.com with SMTP id m8so271613vcd.20        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 17:14:26 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.220.18 with SMTP id hw18mr12555732vcb.59.1353287666741; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 17:14:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.58.235.232 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 17:14:26 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAD_=9DQVqL-dKGdZoL=mm6Z_6OMKXG4J+TdDHU9xFJx01eiCJQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGWvnykEHDCWmGP=+Vs1HahSqp_pfBt7+mXvYmDtsmA4rAUxDg@mail.gmail.com>	<CAD_=9DQVqL-dKGdZoL=mm6Z_6OMKXG4J+TdDHU9xFJx01eiCJQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 01:14:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAGWvnynkSgGru8jmeUfQqAht32JLusbap5R4rNAhhWSj1AYwhw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: VEC re-write [patch 01/25]
From: David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>
To: Diego Novillo <dnovillo@google.com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg01520.txt.bz2

On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Diego Novillo <dnovillo@google.com> wrote:

>>  And now bootstrap fails on AIX using GCC 4.6.3 with the error:
>>
>> /nasfarm/dje/src/src/gcc/c-family/c-lex.c: In function 'c_fileinfo*
>> get_fileinfo(const char*)':
>> /nasfarm/dje/src/src/gcc/c-family/c-lex.c:107:39: error: overloaded
>> function with no contextual type information
>>
>> which is
>>
>>     file_info_tree = splay_tree_new ((splay_tree_compare_fn) strcmp,
>>                                      0,
>>                                      (splay_tree_delete_value_fn) free);
>>
>
> Odd.  The patch did not touch c-lex.c.

I opened PR 55384 to track this

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55384

The problem is AIX stdlib.h defines

#define vec_free free

and vec.h

defines two functions named vec_free()

With the VEC changes, these now are renamed "free" and lead to
ambiguous name resolution.

I am not sure where

#undef vec_free

should be placed.  In vec.h or system.h?

Thanks, David