From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=026X=EB=gmail.com=dje.gcc@sourceware.org>
Received: from mail-ed1-x52b.google.com (mail-ed1-x52b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52b])
	by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 963D7385C6ED
	for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Wed, 16 Aug 2023 22:36:15 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 963D7385C6ED
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com
Received: by mail-ed1-x52b.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5236b2b4cdbso9185248a12.3
        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Wed, 16 Aug 2023 15:36:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1692225374; x=1692830174;
        h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references
         :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
        bh=koAe5E0mbMYWzLYhvkpgAPQhpyCBP8s35er1G67bgwU=;
        b=l6qwu0F2isB4M4Jeu4jJgziM1NDU9uegzj1WbOkHJAYYi9OWd3TFQVRwKyQDn1SCE/
         0ahvfJMkAAhQeM7m1GBemqJh2wvL2/o9ZRt8GA3jq5T4mNvFOEDKPxLQFrKK3VsFPyM+
         NM9FFHnsSRPo83UekZJdeSbZE/Gtntz/bdFQqi7b/tTFah8KeMpH+eEDmmMREDuGrdgO
         ySNyebKKac5nbqvu7V6os9n70IE3W5+ZpBztyWk2I1LW4XFfJxhQcTGDkM5C0yZgizgG
         pmMjUQCvCN7aqTlGfOxFyDawho2q3xlx+r1Ut6vFOy8WVSPDdNk7ZQIvTTd+e/TozIAu
         9ajQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1692225374; x=1692830174;
        h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references
         :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id
         :reply-to;
        bh=koAe5E0mbMYWzLYhvkpgAPQhpyCBP8s35er1G67bgwU=;
        b=iafsPIEmU4gtjYaCWFcAFmtN5RWaEse3uRYlTvrNuS7nrpmoLc9CVn8C9nhNYQL8In
         IzbF4Bv8WMPBGlI+8dvelCNB03IuKd2Iyooh0GvxR2VrsB0tEgM78mcytRyUAH79LHEh
         ZryJ6phdQIqt8oACFYb0rh9mSLODz0AnZM1ydI3UBhwASObR+N6UG4Rw1XlolasQGAvx
         GUhCfK5zn3eVCZDMjj6OiUh7Bfbr+SJXZ7U1UCAsEvdcqYv50vqOI4wh7w3BnZO1alNN
         Qt9RN3k+IT9mUgzk9kfBlWVlTi4g8uzOBYZuOPnchrAB84YF08bGq8zVVgxSW5tIbqvy
         /PpA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzSfJjh5ksJ+cg4ziKJa9XBxLZZvGTWxpvAyAntvopyAQJrPXXL
	69eiSbSBuL0g+wrEErgQy8lGecZRUM9iZu4zqgY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEGkqHrVVSkKAyPmStYnlF3mrLMA+ETNJMeBp1NYGAPiEMFuqK8yRdl3015kwrGaaJ9NAdVbyfUH5CSZLfq98g=
X-Received: by 2002:a50:ed91:0:b0:525:6d9b:15c6 with SMTP id
 h17-20020a50ed91000000b005256d9b15c6mr2341944edr.39.1692225373904; Wed, 16
 Aug 2023 15:36:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAGWvnym1-Xn94BT-y-4Eg7Q+j-zn9b2Lgrqqk8GesXMovBajqQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CACb0b4k8WwGOtRCYJ2ajbi4q5egKbtJ1HE4H=CJBi580LY6uEw@mail.gmail.com> <CACb0b4=UeH2wcf3OLFf2h1GR-PanL5wH8wUVpOpsi+e1-qKCVQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACb0b4=UeH2wcf3OLFf2h1GR-PanL5wH8wUVpOpsi+e1-qKCVQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 18:36:00 -0400
Message-ID: <CAGWvnynxS_6h72--qim-eJizAxPofweKT2ZTC9cRP2HX=GcncQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] libstdc++: Implement more maintainable <version> header
To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Arsen_Arsenovi=C4=87?= <arsen@aarsen.me>, 
	GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004aa384060311ec12"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>

--0000000000004aa384060311ec12
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Was the dependency added to the dependencies in contrib/gcc_update?
Otherwise the timestamp can get out of sync in a Git checkout.

Thanks, David


On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 6:20=E2=80=AFPM Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com=
> wrote:

> On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 at 22:56, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 at 22:39, David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi, Arsen
> > >
> > > This patch broke bootstrap because it has introduced a new GCC build
> requirement for autogen that is not a previous requirement to build GCC.
> Previously the repository has included post-processed files.
> >
> > The repo does include the generated bits/version.h file. autogen
> > should only be needed if you modify version.dep
>
> And I've just checked again with an x86_64-pc-linux-gnu bootstrap on a
> box without autogen, and it worked.
>
> >
> > >
> > > +# AutoGen <bits/version.h>.
> > > +.PHONY: update-version
> > > +update-version:
> > > + cd ${bits_srcdir} && \
> > > + autogen version.def
> > > +
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks, David
> > >
> > >
>
>

--0000000000004aa384060311ec12--