From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-395002-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 66747 invoked by alias); 13 Apr 2015 01:53:59 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 66610 invoked by uid 89); 13 Apr 2015 01:53:57 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-vn0-f41.google.com
Received: from mail-vn0-f41.google.com (HELO mail-vn0-f41.google.com) (209.85.216.41) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 01:53:56 +0000
Received: by vnbf62 with SMTP id f62so15232132vnb.13        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Sun, 12 Apr 2015 18:53:54 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.202.182.136 with SMTP id g130mr5751445oif.94.1428890033942; Sun, 12 Apr 2015 18:53:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.76.25.42 with HTTP; Sun, 12 Apr 2015 18:53:53 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.20.1504102347210.9357@tuna.site>
References: <20141118024816.GA27616@terry-pc01>	<alpine.LSU.2.20.1504102347210.9357@tuna.site>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 01:53:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAGbRaL4RKqJuaYz_xREFBTjgEeUcnYy8Qv5ecVqgwDNCuv-b+g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][wwwdocs] Update 5.0 changes.html with Thumb1 UAL
From: Terry Guo <flameroc@gmail.com>
To: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg00542.txt.bz2

On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 5:48 AM, Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> wrote:
> Hi Terry,
>
> I went ahead and committed some small changes to the description of
> -masm-syntax-unified.  Let me know if you disagree or would like to
> see further changes.
>
> Gerald
>

Thanks for the improvement. I am totally ok with them.

BR,
Terry

> Index: changes.html
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-5/changes.html,v
> retrieving revision 1.101
> diff -u -r1.101 changes.html
> --- changes.html        9 Apr 2015 23:30:47 -0000       1.101
> +++ changes.html        10 Apr 2015 21:47:01 -0000
> @@ -636,8 +636,8 @@
>
>  <h3 id="arm">ARM</h3>
>       <ul>
> -      <li> The Thumb-1 assembly code is now generated in unified syntax. The new option
> -        <code>-masm-syntax-unified</code> can be used to specify whether inline assembly
> +      <li>Thumb-1 assembly code is now generated in unified syntax. The new option
> +        <code>-masm-syntax-unified</code> specifies whether inline assembly
>          code is using unified syntax. By default the option is off which means
>          non-unified syntax is used. However this is subject to change in future releases.
>          Eventually the non-unified syntax will be deprecated.