From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 86826 invoked by alias); 15 Nov 2018 10:24:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 86662 invoked by uid 89); 15 Nov 2018 10:24:50 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,KAM_SHORT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=HX-HELO:sk:mail-pf, H*r:sk:mail-pf, Hx-spam-relays-external:sk:mail-pf, H*RU:sk:mail-pf X-HELO: mail-pf1-f182.google.com Received: from mail-pf1-f182.google.com (HELO mail-pf1-f182.google.com) (209.85.210.182) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 10:24:47 +0000 Received: by mail-pf1-f182.google.com with SMTP id w73so146429pfk.10 for ; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 02:24:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=cnjTTejjbmvJsMfHCyGKoi5rrbjCAwkP/BrFAlxpMAo=; b=Ga4NH7/0YipBnYid73o8TEocdBZj7vizJoyW/XjL1GUAqePZTQuaS2VyXJrjobN4Lu MuUCzvBz9fW5Lm24kQeoCi0BObz57iHHTsjXB15NQgfr9zjI9FqDKP9UO2T6qxD+PInS Gzlixot4ZGfocKuK1GYpgs1iEdWK4oJWRJ51u77lzPcM0xkR8tZXwu+9mhbkPsImRIr7 VB3hdJnR7N+THjPQdQ9RUobhutBpecGMQuei0h3uutksQdaa5QyliWANXzOX0QAKI0UJ 727vbjrIsgF5t6FAb85Il+qPcdMLbCfSbhQadwN06VOaiX9f5F64zS5uKEYy8qGFeReF iSbw== MIME-Version: 1.0 References: From: Umesh Kalappa Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 10:24:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85667 To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Cc: lokeshjanghel91@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-11/txt/msg01360.txt.bz2 Edited the subjected for the proper PR no. ~Umesh On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 2:32 PM Umesh Kalappa wrote: > > Hi All, > > The attached patch (pr85667.patch) fixes the subjected issue . > we tested on x86_64(linux and windows both) and no regress found . > > ok to commit ? > > Thank you > ~Umesh