From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-335631-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 18334 invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2013 18:08:42 -0000
Received: (qmail 18299 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Jan 2013 18:08:41 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-vb0-f47.google.com (HELO mail-vb0-f47.google.com) (209.85.212.47)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 18:08:29 +0000
Received: by mail-vb0-f47.google.com with SMTP id e21so1623077vbm.34        for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 10:08:27 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.66.71 with SMTP id d7mr1932001vdt.121.1358359707855; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 10:08:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.220.241.212 with HTTP; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 10:08:27 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAKwh3qh7y9uXvFtQVnsiBX-b9OiW+0wCTtuM-MBo_+mcHq5CEA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKwh3qh7y9uXvFtQVnsiBX-b9OiW+0wCTtuM-MBo_+mcHq5CEA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 18:08:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAGkQGiJCf+Hcd-dJEpJ=gb5_0RnCy93LXC7VAWBG4u6Emd1mRQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 55983: [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in find_typebound_proc_uop, at fortran/class.c:2711
From: Paul Richard Thomas <paul.richard.thomas@gmail.com>
To: Janus Weil <janus@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: gfortran <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg00874.txt.bz2

Dear Janus,

As you say, this is close to being obvious - OK for trunk and for 4.7.

Thanks for the patch.

Cheers

Paul

On 16 January 2013 15:08, Janus Weil <janus@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> here is a close-to-obvious patch for an ICE-on-invalid regression. It
> removes as assert, which is reasonable for valid code but can fail
> under error conditions (as the PR shows), and replaces it with an
> equivalent IF clause.
>
> Regtested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Ok for trunk and 4.7?
>
> Cheers,
> Janus
>
>
> 2013-01-16  Janus Weil  <janus@gcc.gnu.org>
>
>     PR fortran/55983
>     * class.c (find_typebound_proc_uop): Check for f2k_derived instead of
>     asserting it.
>
>
> 2013-01-16  Janus Weil  <janus@gcc.gnu.org>
>
>     PR fortran/55983
>     * gfortran.dg/class_55.f90: New.



-- 
The knack of flying is learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss.
       --Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy