From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-304637-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 343 invoked by alias); 16 Oct 2011 18:19:23 -0000
Received: (qmail 323 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Oct 2011 18:19:22 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-ww0-f51.google.com (HELO mail-ww0-f51.google.com) (74.125.82.51)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 18:19:08 +0000
Received: by wwe32 with SMTP id 32so1160470wwe.8        for <multiple recipients>; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 11:19:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.25.196 with SMTP id z46mr5893901wez.16.1318789146926; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 11:19:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.234.3 with HTTP; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 11:19:06 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAKwh3qjR-2F4x+EA_K5OfDinHaCrLepLB6+ixB-KzE93jttANw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKwh3qjR-2F4x+EA_K5OfDinHaCrLepLB6+ixB-KzE93jttANw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 19:21:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAGkQGiJMaABAPJ0oSStPaw=YcvyW=M4XE8Ns=K-wRTr45jPMuQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 47023: [4.6/4.7 regression] C_Sizeof: Rejects valid code
From: Paul Richard Thomas <paul.richard.thomas@gmail.com>
To: Janus Weil <janus@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: gfortran <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-10/txt/msg01435.txt.bz2

Dear Janus,

This is OK for trunk.  Thanks fo rthe patch.

Cheers

Paul

On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Janus Weil <janus@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> here is a patch which fixes the regression in comment #2 of the PR in
> the subject line. What it does is setting the 'ts.is_c_interop' flag
> correctly for constants with kind-parameter specification (such as
> '0.0_c_double'), as is already being done for variables.
>
> Regtested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Ok for trunk and 4.6?
>
> Cheers,
> Janus
>
>
> 2011-10-16 =A0Janus Weil =A0<janus@gcc.gnu.org>
>
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0PR fortran/47023
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* primary.c (match_kind_param): Detect ISO_C_BINDING kinds.
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0(get_kind): Pass on 'is_iso_c' flag.
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0(match_integer_constant,match_real_constant,match_logical_=
constant):
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Set 'ts.is_c_interop'.
>
>
> 2011-10-16 =A0Janus Weil =A0<janus@gcc.gnu.org>
>
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0PR fortran/47023
> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0* gfortran.dg/c_kind_tests_3.f03: New.
>



--=20
The knack of flying is learning how to throw yourself at the ground and mis=
s.
=A0 =A0 =A0=A0 --Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy