Re: [PATCH] PR fortran/82049 -- resolve a charlen if possible

[Paul Richard Thomas <paul.richard.thomas@gmail.com>]

Hi Steve,

That's OK for trunk and, if you are possessed of the intestinal
fortitude, 6- and 7-branches.

Thanks

Paul


On 7 February 2018 at 02:17, Steve Kargl
<sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote:
> The attached patch fixes PR fortran/82049.  Prior to this
> patch, gfortran was fouling up the resolution of the charlen
> expression in the testcase.  The immediately tries to resolve
> the length while parsing the type-spec.
>
> While here, I've introduced an optimization that causes
> gfc_match_type_spec() to return early if the gfortran isn't
> going to be getting a type-spec.  This is done be peeking
> at the next character, if it is in [a-z], the we don't have
> a type spec.  OK to commit?
>
>
> 2018-02-06  Steven G. Kargl  <kargl@gcc.gnu.org>
>
>         PR fortran/82049
>         * match.c (gfc_match_type_spec): If the charlen is non-NULL, then
>         try to resolve it.  While here return early if possible.
>
> 2018-02-06  Steven G. Kargl  <kargl@gcc.gnu.org>
>
>         PR fortran/82049
>         * gfortran.dg/assumed_charlen_parameter.f90: New test.
>
>
> --
> Steve



-- 
"If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough"
- Albert Einstein