From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 92105 invoked by alias); 18 Sep 2018 17:51:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 92069 invoked by uid 89); 18 Sep 2018 17:51:34 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=U*tkoenig, Koenig, koenig, sk:tkoenig X-HELO: mail-yw1-f66.google.com Received: from mail-yw1-f66.google.com (HELO mail-yw1-f66.google.com) (209.85.161.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Sep 2018 17:51:33 +0000 Received: by mail-yw1-f66.google.com with SMTP id 14-v6so1156724ywe.2; Tue, 18 Sep 2018 10:51:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=E6v7qy1DApCVZgQsVq1/i0TK3Iuvs8Labme7c8pdwKU=; b=sRnDupsYvBc5fKCu6fY0J/RopxO9bLRkB/9qrQNYDkJjzfk6GByZg8Fj2kP1e0zg6/ OFA0Jvse0bwcAoxAiyi5WTxGWwnhPUg0CUM8ybi11VKtELnhCL8wLKKC3X0kjiCyL/Pk npnbPmVppImWr30RQKxB5anojNC7PmWPbmDFm4KKsTZzxNkJlJ5k3CUw9bGYi2Jf3ZvY zHVbq3ReZT/7eDyFWeK6Dbp7TH+mP7pnAAOux9kuyV8PggehMcsDiT9NF6P+HlCPX7R6 96dBhPH4l0CuNiP1d0yBsLpQi/L1Z0OQqlhlxlD+x8RMMZ7JgRi1ElRhXoJX2vs1VFwn Hrlg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a81:7a4b:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Sep 2018 10:51:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Paul Richard Thomas Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 18:20:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Patch, fortran] PR87336] [8/9 regression] wrong output for pointer dummy assiocated to target actual argument To: Thomas Koenig Cc: "fortran@gcc.gnu.org" , gcc-patches , =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=BCrgen_Reuter?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-SW-Source: 2018-09/txt/msg01014.txt.bz2 Thanks Thomas, I'll take a look at your in a few minutes. Cheers Paul On 18 September 2018 at 18:50, Thomas Koenig wrote: > Hi Paul, > >> Bootstraps and regtests on FC28/x86_64 - OK for 8- and 9-branches? > > > OK. Thanks for the patch! > > Regards > > Thomas -- "If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough" - Albert Einstein