public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Richard Thomas <paul.richard.thomas@gmail.com>
To: "fortran@gcc.gnu.org" <fortran@gcc.gnu.org>,
	gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: [Patch, fortran] PR96495 - [gfortran] Composition of user-defined operators does not copy ALLOCATABLE property of derived type
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 12:50:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGkQGiLaOknkQOpGqixd-P8YuUD0JAHyOjoc72Uaz=w-eaWKQw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 970 bytes --]

This patch detects a scalar function result that has allocatable components
and is being used inside a scalarization loop. Before this patch, the
components would be deallocated and nullified within the scalarization loop
and so would cause a segfault on the second cycle of the loop.

The stored result has to be found by identifying the expression in the loop
ss chain. This is then used for the deallocation of the allocatable
components in the loop post block, which keeps gimple happy and prevents
the segfault.

Regtests on FC31/x86_64 - OK for master?

Paul

This patch fixes PR96495 - frees result components outside loop.

2020-29-08  Paul Thomas  <pault@gcc.gnu.org>

gcc/fortran
PR fortran/96495
* trans-expr.c (gfc_conv_procedure_call): Take the deallocation
of allocatable result components of a scalar result outside the
scalarization loop. Find and use the stored result.

gcc/testsuite/
PR fortran/96495
* gfortran.dg/alloc_comp_result_2.f90 : New test.

[-- Attachment #2: submit.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1393 bytes --]

diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c b/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c
index 36ff9b5cbc6..a690839f591 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c
@@ -6421,6 +6421,26 @@ gfc_conv_procedure_call (gfc_se * se, gfc_symbol * sym,
 
 	  if (!finalized && !e->must_finalize)
 	    {
+	      bool scalar_res_outside_loop;
+	      scalar_res_outside_loop = e->expr_type == EXPR_FUNCTION
+					&& parm_rank == 0
+					&& parmse.loop;
+
+	      if (scalar_res_outside_loop)
+		{
+		  /* Go through the ss chain to find the argument and use
+		     the stored value.  */
+		  gfc_ss *tmp_ss = parmse.loop->ss;
+		  for (; tmp_ss; tmp_ss = tmp_ss->next)
+		    if (tmp_ss->info
+			&& tmp_ss->info->expr == e
+			&& tmp_ss->info->data.scalar.value != NULL_TREE)
+		      {
+			tmp = tmp_ss->info->data.scalar.value;
+			break;
+		      }
+		}
+
 	      if ((e->ts.type == BT_CLASS
 		   && GFC_CLASS_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (tmp)))
 		  || e->ts.type == BT_DERIVED)
@@ -6429,7 +6449,11 @@ gfc_conv_procedure_call (gfc_se * se, gfc_symbol * sym,
 	      else if (e->ts.type == BT_CLASS)
 		tmp = gfc_deallocate_alloc_comp (CLASS_DATA (e)->ts.u.derived,
 						 tmp, parm_rank);
-	      gfc_prepend_expr_to_block (&post, tmp);
+
+	      if (scalar_res_outside_loop)
+		gfc_add_expr_to_block (&parmse.loop->post, tmp);
+	      else
+		gfc_prepend_expr_to_block (&post, tmp);
 	    }
         }
 

[-- Attachment #3: alloc_comp_result_2.f90 --]
[-- Type: text/x-fortran, Size: 1577 bytes --]

! { dg-do run }
!
! Test the fix for PR96495 - segfaults at runtime at locations below.
!
! Contributed by Paul Luckner  <paul.luckner@rwth-aachen.de>
!
module foo_m

  implicit none

  type foo
    integer, allocatable :: j(:)
  end type

  interface operator(.unary.)
    module procedure neg_foo
  end interface

  interface operator(.binary.)
    module procedure foo_sub_foo
  end interface

  interface operator(.binaryElemental.)
    module procedure foo_add_foo
  end interface

contains

  elemental function foo_add_foo(f, g) result(h)
    !! an example for an elemental binary operator
    type(foo), intent(in) :: f, g
    type(foo)             :: h

    allocate (h%j(size(f%j)), source = f%j+g%j)
  end function

  elemental function foo_sub_foo(f, g) result(h)
    !! an example for an elemental binary operator
    type(foo), intent(in) :: f, g
    type(foo)             :: h

    allocate (h%j(size(f%j)), source = f%j-3*g%j)
  end function

  pure function neg_foo(f) result(g)
    !! an example for a unary operator
    type(foo), intent(in) :: f
    type(foo)             :: g

    allocate (g%j(size(f%j)), source = -f%j)
  end function

end module

program main_tmp

  use foo_m

  implicit none

  type(foo) f, g(2)

  allocate (f%j(3))
  f%j = [2, 3, 4]

  g = f
  if (any (g(2)%j .ne. [2, 3, 4])) stop 1

  g = g .binaryElemental. (f .binary. f)     ! threw "Segmentation fault"
  if (any (g(2)%j .ne. [-2,-3,-4])) stop 2

  g = g .binaryElemental. (  .unary.  f)     ! threw "Segmentation fault"
  if (any (g(2)%j .ne. [-4,-6,-8])) stop 3

end program

             reply	other threads:[~2020-08-29 11:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-29 11:50 Paul Richard Thomas [this message]
2020-08-31 10:27 ` Andre Vehreschild

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAGkQGiLaOknkQOpGqixd-P8YuUD0JAHyOjoc72Uaz=w-eaWKQw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=paul.richard.thomas@gmail.com \
    --cc=fortran@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).