* [Patch, fortran] PR45305 - Array-valued calls to elementals are not simplified
[not found] <CAGkQGiL0eF56n+YWwrkyk0ujXaSe+3u0gHSEMUvunhSRP-BsYw@mail.gmail.com>
@ 2018-06-27 13:48 ` Paul Richard Thomas
2018-06-30 14:42 ` Jerry DeLisle
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Paul Richard Thomas @ 2018-06-27 13:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: fortran, gcc-patches
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1190 bytes --]
I posted a patch for this on the PR in August 2010. Dominique pointed
out that it caused repeated error messages in some testcases; eg.
arithmetic_overflow_1.f90
As it happens, that seems to have crept in at some time even without
the patch for this PR. Nevertheless, I have modified the patch
slightly to prevent any more escalation. Apart from this, the patch is
very straightforward.
Bootstraps and regtests on FC28/x86_64 - OK for trunk and....?
Paul
2018-06-27 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/45305
* expr.c : Add a prototype for scalarize_intrinsic_call.
(gfc_simplify_expr): Use scalarize_intrinsic_call for elemental
intrinsic function calls.
(scalarize_intrinsic_call): Add 'init_flag' argument. Check if
the expression or any of the actual argument expressions are
NULL. Before calling gfc_check_init_expr, check 'init_flag'.
Only simplify the scalarized expressions if there are no errors
on the stack.
(gfc_check_init_expr): Set 'init_flag' true in the call to
scalarize_intrinsic_call.
2018-06-27 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/45305
* gfortran.dg/scalarize_parameter_array_3.f90: New test.
[-- Attachment #2: Change.Logs --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 693 bytes --]
2018-06-27 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/45305
* expr.c : Add a prototype for scalarize_intrinsic_call.
(gfc_simplify_expr): Use scalarize_intrinsic_call for elemental
intrinsic function calls.
(scalarize_intrinsic_call): Add 'init_flag' argument. Check if
the expression or any of the actual argument expressions are
NULL. Before calling gfc_check_init_expr, check 'init_flag'.
Only simplify the scalarized expressions if there are no errors
on the stack.
(gfc_check_init_expr): Set 'init_flag' true in the call to
scalarize_intrinsic_call.
2018-06-27 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/45305
* gfortran.dg/scalarize_parameter_array_3.f90: New test.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [Patch, fortran] PR45305 - Array-valued calls to elementals are not simplified
2018-06-27 13:48 ` [Patch, fortran] PR45305 - Array-valued calls to elementals are not simplified Paul Richard Thomas
@ 2018-06-30 14:42 ` Jerry DeLisle
2018-06-30 15:32 ` Paul Richard Thomas
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jerry DeLisle @ 2018-06-30 14:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul Richard Thomas, fortran, gcc-patches
On 06/27/2018 06:48 AM, Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
> I posted a patch for this on the PR in August 2010. Dominique pointed
> out that it caused repeated error messages in some testcases; eg.
> arithmetic_overflow_1.f90
>
> As it happens, that seems to have crept in at some time even without
> the patch for this PR. Nevertheless, I have modified the patch
> slightly to prevent any more escalation. Apart from this, the patch is
> very straightforward.
>
> Bootstraps and regtests on FC28/x86_64 - OK for trunk and....?
>
> Paul
>
Well this goes way back. OK for trunk. If you want to backport to 7 and
8, your choice.
Jerry
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [Patch, fortran] PR45305 - Array-valued calls to elementals are not simplified
2018-06-30 14:42 ` Jerry DeLisle
@ 2018-06-30 15:32 ` Paul Richard Thomas
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Paul Richard Thomas @ 2018-06-30 15:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jerry DeLisle; +Cc: fortran, gcc-patches
Ok, thanks.
I think that I will stick to trunk, since we do not seem to have been
overwhelmed with demand to fix this!
Regards
Paul
On Sat, 30 Jun 2018 at 15:37, Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle@charter.net> wrote:
>
> On 06/27/2018 06:48 AM, Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
> > I posted a patch for this on the PR in August 2010. Dominique pointed
> > out that it caused repeated error messages in some testcases; eg.
> > arithmetic_overflow_1.f90
> >
> > As it happens, that seems to have crept in at some time even without
> > the patch for this PR. Nevertheless, I have modified the patch
> > slightly to prevent any more escalation. Apart from this, the patch is
> > very straightforward.
> >
> > Bootstraps and regtests on FC28/x86_64 - OK for trunk and....?
> >
> > Paul
> >
>
> Well this goes way back. OK for trunk. If you want to backport to 7 and
> 8, your choice.
>
> Jerry
--
"If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough"
- Albert Einstein
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-06-30 15:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <CAGkQGiL0eF56n+YWwrkyk0ujXaSe+3u0gHSEMUvunhSRP-BsYw@mail.gmail.com>
2018-06-27 13:48 ` [Patch, fortran] PR45305 - Array-valued calls to elementals are not simplified Paul Richard Thomas
2018-06-30 14:42 ` Jerry DeLisle
2018-06-30 15:32 ` Paul Richard Thomas
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).