From: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh@redhat.com>
To: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew MacLeod <amacleod@redhat.com>,
GCC patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: redundant bitmap_bit_p followed by bitmap_clear_bit [was: Re: [COMMITTED] Kill second order relations in the path solver.]
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 15:21:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGm3qMUuxtJSfGHFot8QPJpihK4-9ojkKCkR7JQUTWEWnN3pGA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211101151027.06945d6a@nbbrfq>
I'm not convinced this makes the code clearer to read, especially if
it's not on a critical path. But if you feel strongly, please submit
a patch ;-).
Aldy
On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 3:10 PM Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
<rep.dot.nop@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 28 Oct 2021 01:55:30 +0200
> Bernhard Reutner-Fischer <rep.dot.nop@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 20:13:21 +0200
> > Aldy Hernandez via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> > > @@ -1306,6 +1307,24 @@ path_oracle::killing_def (tree ssa)
> > > ptr->m_next = m_equiv.m_next;
> > > m_equiv.m_next = ptr;
> > > bitmap_ior_into (m_equiv.m_names, b);
> > > +
> > > + // Walk the relation list an remove SSA from any relations.
> >
> > s/an /and /
> >
> > > + if (!bitmap_bit_p (m_relations.m_names, v))
> > > + return;
> > > +
> > > + bitmap_clear_bit (m_relations.m_names, v);
> >
> > IIRC bitmap_clear_bit returns true if the bit was set, false otherwise,
> > so should be used as if(!bitmap_clear_bit) above.
>
> > > + relation_chain **prev = &(m_relations.m_head);
> >
> > s/[()]//
> > thanks,
>
> There seems to be two other spots where a redundant bitmap_bit_p checks
> if we want to bitmap_clear_bit. In dse and ira.
> Like:
> $ cat ~/coccinelle/gcc_bitmap_bit_p-0.cocci ; echo EOF
> // replace redundant bitmap_bit_p() bitmap_clear_bit with the latter
> @ rule1 @
> identifier fn;
> expression bitmap, bit;
> @@
>
> fn(...) {
> <...
> (
> -if (bitmap_bit_p (bitmap, bit))
> +if (bitmap_clear_bit (bitmap, bit))
> {
> ...
> - bitmap_clear_bit (bitmap, bit);
> ...
> }
> |
> -if (bitmap_bit_p (bitmap, bit))
> +if (bitmap_clear_bit (bitmap, bit))
> {
> ...
> }
> ...
> -bitmap_clear_bit (bitmap, bit);
> )
> ...>
> }
> EOF
> $ find gcc/ -type f -a \( -name "*.c" -o -name "*.cc" \) -a \( ! -path "gcc/testsuite/*" -a ! -path "gcc/contrib/*" \) -exec spatch -sp_file ~/coccinelle/gcc_bitmap_bit_p-0.cocci --show-diff {} \;
> diff =
> --- gcc/dse.c
> +++ /tmp/cocci-output-1104419-443759-dse.c
> @@ -3238,9 +3238,8 @@ mark_reachable_blocks (sbitmap unreachab
> edge e;
> edge_iterator ei;
>
> - if (bitmap_bit_p (unreachable_blocks, bb->index))
> + if (bitmap_clear_bit(unreachable_blocks, bb->index))
> {
> - bitmap_clear_bit (unreachable_blocks, bb->index);
> FOR_EACH_EDGE (e, ei, bb->preds)
> {
> mark_reachable_blocks (unreachable_blocks, e->src);
> diff =
> --- gcc/ira.c
> +++ /tmp/cocci-output-1104678-d8679a-ira.c
> @@ -2944,17 +2944,15 @@ mark_elimination (int from, int to)
> FOR_EACH_BB_FN (bb, cfun)
> {
> r = DF_LR_IN (bb);
> - if (bitmap_bit_p (r, from))
> + if (bitmap_clear_bit(r, from))
> {
> - bitmap_clear_bit (r, from);
> bitmap_set_bit (r, to);
> }
> if (! df_live)
> continue;
> r = DF_LIVE_IN (bb);
> - if (bitmap_bit_p (r, from))
> + if (bitmap_clear_bit(r, from))
> {
> - bitmap_clear_bit (r, from);
> bitmap_set_bit (r, to);
> }
> }
> # in ira.c one would have to fixup the curly braces manually
> PS: coccinelle seems to ruin the spaces before braces in the '+' even
> though i have written them correctly according to GNU style..
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-01 14:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-27 18:13 [COMMITTED] Kill second order relations in the path solver Aldy Hernandez
2021-10-27 18:13 ` [COMMITTED] Reorder relation calculating code " Aldy Hernandez
2021-10-27 18:13 ` [COMMITTED] Kill known equivalences before a new assignment " Aldy Hernandez
2021-10-27 23:55 ` [COMMITTED] Kill second order relations " Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2021-11-01 14:10 ` redundant bitmap_bit_p followed by bitmap_clear_bit [was: Re: [COMMITTED] Kill second order relations in the path solver.] Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2021-11-01 14:21 ` Aldy Hernandez [this message]
2021-11-01 21:02 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2021-11-02 13:43 ` Richard Biener
2021-11-02 18:01 ` Richard Sandiford
2021-11-02 21:00 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2021-11-03 8:01 ` Richard Biener
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAGm3qMUuxtJSfGHFot8QPJpihK4-9ojkKCkR7JQUTWEWnN3pGA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=aldyh@redhat.com \
--cc=amacleod@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=rep.dot.nop@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).