From: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh@redhat.com>
To: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
Cc: Andrew MacLeod <amacleod@redhat.com>,
gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Tame path_range_query::compute_imports
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 14:32:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGm3qMVcnRxCFsbJXVLeoLPaZfBgvJUSxm7HVLhnEPEJ_Zw4-g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <nycvar.YFH.7.77.849.2208161221050.13569@jbgna.fhfr.qr>
On Tue, Aug 16, 2022, 14:26 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Aug 2022, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 1:38 PM Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 16 Aug 2022, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 11:53 AM Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The remaining issue I have with the path_range_query is that
> > > > > we re-use the same instance in the back threader but the
> > > > > class doesn't provide any way to "restart", aka give m_path
> > > > > a lifetime. The "start a new path" API seems to essentially
> > > > > be compute_ranges (), but there's no convenient way to end.
> > > > > It might be more appropriate to re-instantiate the
> path_range_query,
> > > > > though that comes at a cost. Or abstract an actual query, like
> > > > > adding a
> > > >
> > > > Yes, compute_ranges() is the way to start a new path. It resets exit
> > > > dependencies, the path, relations, etc. I think it would be clearer
> > > > to name it set_path (or reset_path if we want to share nomenclature
> > > > with the path_oracle).
> > > >
> > > > Instantiating a new path_range_query per path is fine, as long as you
> > > > allocate the ranger it uses yourself, instead of letting
> > > > path_range_query allocate it. Instantiating a new ranger does have a
> > > > cost, and it's best to let path_range_query re-use a ranger from path
> > > > to path. This is why path_range_query is (class) global in the
> > > > backwards threader. Andrew mentioned last year making the ranger
> > > > start-up 0-cost, but it still leaves the internal caching the ranger
> > > > will do from path to path (well, the stuff outside the current path,
> > > > cause the stuff inside the path is irrelevant since it'll get
> > > > recalculated).
> > > >
> > > > However, why can't you use compute_ranges (or whatever we rename it
> to ;-))??
> > >
> > > I've added
> > >
> > > auto_bb_flag m_on_path;
> > >
> > > to the path query and at set_path time set m_on_path on each BB so
> > > the m_path->contains () linear walks go away. But I need to clear
> > > the flag for which I would need something like finish_path (),
> > > doing it just at the point we deallocate the path query object
> > > or when we set the next path via compute_ranges doesn't look right
> > > (and in fact it doesn't work out-of-the-box without adjusting the
> > > lifetime of the path query object).
> > >
> > > So a more incremental thing would be to add such finish_path ()
> > > or to make the whole path query object single-shot, thus remove
> > > compute_ranges and instead use the CTOR for this.
> > >
> > > Probably not too important (for short paths).
> >
> > On a high level, I wonder if this matters since we don't allow long
> > paths for other performance reasons you've already tackled. But OTOH,
> > I've always been a little uncomfortable with contains_p linear search,
> > so if you think this makes a difference, go right ahead :).
> >
> > I'm fine with either the finish_path() or the single-shot thing you
> > speak of. Although making path query inmutable makes things cleaner
> > in the long run. I like it! My guess is that the non-ranger
> > instantiation penalty would be minimal. I'd even remove the default
> > (auto-allocated) ranger from path_range_query, to make it obvious that
> > you need to manage that yourself and avoid folks shooting themselves
> > in the foot.
>
> We currently have
>
> path_range_query::path_range_query (bool resolve, gimple_ranger *ranger)
> : m_cache (new ssa_global_cache),
> m_has_cache_entry (BITMAP_ALLOC (NULL)),
> m_resolve (resolve),
> m_alloced_ranger (!ranger)
> {
> if (m_alloced_ranger)
> m_ranger = new gimple_ranger;
> else
> m_ranger = ranger;
>
> m_oracle = new path_oracle (m_ranger->oracle ());
>
> if (m_resolve && flag_checking)
> verify_marked_backedges (cfun);
> }
>
> so at least verify_marked_backedges will explode, I suppose we
> want to hoist that somehow ...
>
Good point.
> then we allocate the path_oracle - that one does have a
> reset_path () function at least. It's allocation looks
> quite harmless, but we should only need it when m_resolve?
>
Yes.
> > Wanna have a go at it? If you'd rather not, I can work on it.
>
> If you have cycles go ahead - I'm fiddling with other parts of
> the threader right now.
>
Sure, I'll take a stab at it. Thanks for the other stuff you're doing on
the threader.
Aldy
> Richard.
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-16 12:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <73820.122081107421800679@us-mta-533.us.mimecast.lan>
2022-08-11 13:11 ` Aldy Hernandez
2022-08-11 13:59 ` Andrew MacLeod
2022-08-11 15:11 ` Aldy Hernandez
2022-08-15 9:53 ` Richard Biener
2022-08-16 8:56 ` Aldy Hernandez
2022-08-16 9:28 ` Richard Biener
2022-08-16 10:25 ` Aldy Hernandez
2022-08-16 11:38 ` Richard Biener
2022-08-16 12:17 ` Aldy Hernandez
2022-08-16 12:26 ` Richard Biener
2022-08-16 12:32 ` Aldy Hernandez [this message]
2022-08-16 13:47 ` Andrew MacLeod
2022-08-16 13:55 ` Aldy Hernandez
2022-08-16 8:21 ` Aldy Hernandez
2022-08-16 8:32 ` Richard Biener
2022-08-16 9:08 ` Aldy Hernandez
2022-08-16 9:15 ` Aldy Hernandez
2022-08-16 9:28 ` Richard Biener
2022-08-16 13:42 ` Andrew MacLeod
2022-08-17 1:16 ` [COMMITTED] Abstract interesting ssa-names from GORI Andrew MacLeod
2022-08-17 1:18 ` Andrew MacLeod
2022-08-18 7:26 ` Aldy Hernandez
2022-08-11 11:42 [PATCH] Tame path_range_query::compute_imports Richard Biener
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-08-11 11:42 Richard Biener
2022-08-11 11:42 Richard Biener
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAGm3qMVcnRxCFsbJXVLeoLPaZfBgvJUSxm7HVLhnEPEJ_Zw4-g@mail.gmail.com \
--to=aldyh@redhat.com \
--cc=amacleod@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=rguenther@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).