Thanks.

On Wed, May 3, 2023, 11:17 Martin Liška <mliska@suse.cz> wrote:

> Pushed to master as obvious.
>
> Martin
>
>         PR tree-optimization/109693
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
>         * value-range-storage.cc (vrange_allocator::vrange_allocator):
>         Remove unused field.
>         * value-range-storage.h: Likewise.
> ---
>  gcc/value-range-storage.cc | 1 -
>  gcc/value-range-storage.h  | 1 -
>  2 files changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/value-range-storage.cc b/gcc/value-range-storage.cc
> index 7d2de5e8384..14bec500dbc 100644
> --- a/gcc/value-range-storage.cc
> +++ b/gcc/value-range-storage.cc
> @@ -80,7 +80,6 @@ public:
>  };
>
>  vrange_allocator::vrange_allocator (bool gc)
> -  : m_gc (gc)
>  {
>    if (gc)
>      m_alloc = new vrange_ggc_alloc;
> diff --git a/gcc/value-range-storage.h b/gcc/value-range-storage.h
> index 4ec0da73059..a90b64b2bf0 100644
> --- a/gcc/value-range-storage.h
> +++ b/gcc/value-range-storage.h
> @@ -38,7 +38,6 @@ public:
>  private:
>    DISABLE_COPY_AND_ASSIGN (vrange_allocator);
>    class vrange_internal_alloc *m_alloc;
> -  bool m_gc;
>  };
>
>  // Efficient memory storage for a vrange.
> --
> 2.40.1
>
>