public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh@redhat.com>
To: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew MacLeod <amacleod@redhat.com>,
	GCC patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Avoid further recomputations in path_range_query once path is finalized.
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 18:14:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGm3qMWBX1XN=1yqThBiF1-z-h5hFhEyWbDe2mG9D-8hd8STmQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFiYyc3wbUvjY+LLNU2a-05MqzQgVqp3AvC0PtOD6=WKSW=L-g@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 4:12 PM Richard Biener
<richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 3:59 PM Aldy Hernandez <aldyh@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > [Richi, I'm trying to make things more obvious for others working for the
> > cose base.  What do you think?]
> >
> > This makes a few things explicit to avoid misuse.  First, we add a
> > flag to differentiate between a path whose depdenency ranges are being
> > computed, and a path that is finalized and no further calculations
> > should be done.  I've also enhanced the comments to document what
> > queries are supported.  Finally, I added some asserts to make sure
> > range_of_expr is only used on the final conditional once the path has
> > been finalized.
> >
> > Unfortunately, the forward threader builds dummy statements it passes
> > to the path solver.  Most of these don't have a BB associated with
> > them.  I've cleared the BB field for the one that still had one, to
> > make the asserts above work.
> >
> > No difference in thread counts over my cc1 .ii files.
> >
> > gcc/ChangeLog:
> >
> >         * gimple-range-path.cc (path_range_query::path_range_query):
> >         Initialized m_path_finalized.
> >         (path_range_query::internal_range_of_expr): Avoid further
> >         recomputations once path is finalized.
> >         Take basic_block instead of stmt as argument.
> >         (path_range_query::range_of_expr): Document.  Add asserts.
> >         (path_range_query::compute_ranges): Set m_path_finalized.
> >         * gimple-range-path.h (path_range_query::internal_range_of_expr):
> >         Replace statement argument with basic block.
> >         (class path_range_query): Add m_path_finalized.
> >         * tree-ssa-threadedge.cc
> >         (jump_threader::simplify_control_stmt_condition): Clear BB field
> >         in dummy_switch.
> > ---
> >  gcc/gimple-range-path.cc   | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> >  gcc/gimple-range-path.h    |  7 +++++-
> >  gcc/tree-ssa-threadedge.cc |  1 +
> >  3 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/gcc/gimple-range-path.cc b/gcc/gimple-range-path.cc
> > index c99d77dd340..a8412dd090b 100644
> > --- a/gcc/gimple-range-path.cc
> > +++ b/gcc/gimple-range-path.cc
> > @@ -40,7 +40,8 @@ path_range_query::path_range_query (bool resolve, gimple_ranger *ranger)
> >    : m_cache (new ssa_global_cache),
> >      m_has_cache_entry (BITMAP_ALLOC (NULL)),
> >      m_resolve (resolve),
> > -    m_alloced_ranger (!ranger)
> > +    m_alloced_ranger (!ranger),
> > +    m_path_finalized (false)
> >  {
> >    if (m_alloced_ranger)
> >      m_ranger = new gimple_ranger;
> > @@ -159,7 +160,7 @@ path_range_query::range_on_path_entry (vrange &r, tree name)
> >  // Return the range of NAME at the end of the path being analyzed.
> >
> >  bool
> > -path_range_query::internal_range_of_expr (vrange &r, tree name, gimple *stmt)
> > +path_range_query::internal_range_of_expr (vrange &r, tree name, basic_block bb)
> >  {
> >    if (!r.supports_type_p (TREE_TYPE (name)))
> >      return false;
> > @@ -174,8 +175,16 @@ path_range_query::internal_range_of_expr (vrange &r, tree name, gimple *stmt)
> >        return true;
> >      }
> >
> > -  if (stmt
> > -      && range_defined_in_block (r, name, gimple_bb (stmt)))
> > +  // Avoid further recomputations once the path has been finalized.
> > +  if (m_path_finalized)
> > +    {
> > +      gimple_range_global (r, name);
>
> I suppose we can't assert here instead?
>
> > +      return true;
> > +    }
> > +
> > +  // We're being called as part of the calculation of ranges for exit
> > +  // dependencies.  Set the cache as we traverse the path top-down.
> > +  if (bb && range_defined_in_block (r, name, bb))
> >      {
> >        if (TREE_CODE (name) == SSA_NAME)
> >         {
> > @@ -192,10 +201,37 @@ path_range_query::internal_range_of_expr (vrange &r, tree name, gimple *stmt)
> >    return true;
> >  }
> >
> > +// This, as well as range_of_stmt, are the main entry points for
> > +// making queries about a path.
> > +//
> > +// Once the ranges for the exit dependencies have been pre-calculated,
> > +// the path is considered finalized, and the only valid query is
> > +// asking the range of a NAME at the end of the path.
> > +//
> > +// Note that this method can also be called internally before the path
> > +// is finalized, as part of the path traversal pre-calculating the
> > +// ranges for exit dependencies.  In this case, it may be called on
> > +// statements that are not the final conditional as described above.
> > +
> >  bool
> >  path_range_query::range_of_expr (vrange &r, tree name, gimple *stmt)
> >  {
> > -  if (internal_range_of_expr (r, name, stmt))
> > +  basic_block bb = stmt ? gimple_bb (stmt) : NULL;
> > +
> > +  // Once a path is finalized, the only valid queries are of the final
> > +  // statement in the exit block.
>
> why?  shouldn't we support queries for all dependent ranges (what
> the user specified as imports argument to compute_ranges)?

Yes, we allow queries of all dependent ranges, but as viewed from the
exit from the path.

>
> If we want to restrict things this way shouldn't we simply not expose
> this function but instead just path_range_query::range_of_exit,
> or even what the threader uses as find_taken_edge?

Hmm, that's a very good point.  For that matter, the original
implementation just had a range_of_exit public method.  It evolved to
the current version, because having it behave like a range_query has
other benefits.  For example, I thought that you could pass the path
query to things like simplify_using_ranges, to simplify a statement
given a path.  In reality, that hasn't happened.

So lemme put this aside for now, while I think and experiment a little.

Thanks for the feedback.
Aldy

>
> The loop header copying case would also work with this,
> it's interested in the known outgoing edge of the path.
>
> > +  if (flag_checking && m_path_finalized && stmt)
> > +    {
> > +      // The forward threader may query dummy statements without a
> > +      // basic block.
> > +      if (bb)
> > +       {
> > +         gcc_assert (stmt == last_stmt (bb));
> > +         gcc_assert (bb == exit_bb ());
> > +       }
> > +    }
> > +
> > +  if (internal_range_of_expr (r, name, bb))
> >      {
> >        if (r.undefined_p ())
> >         m_undefined_path = true;
> > @@ -608,6 +644,7 @@ path_range_query::compute_ranges (const vec<basic_block> &path,
> >
> >    set_path (path);
> >    m_undefined_path = false;
> > +  m_path_finalized = false;
> >
> >    if (dependencies)
> >      bitmap_copy (m_exit_dependencies, dependencies);
> > @@ -642,6 +679,7 @@ path_range_query::compute_ranges (const vec<basic_block> &path,
> >
> >        move_next ();
> >      }
> > +  m_path_finalized = true;
> >
> >    if (DEBUG_SOLVER)
> >      {
> > @@ -730,6 +768,8 @@ jt_fur_source::query_relation (tree op1, tree op2)
> >  }
> >
> >  // Return the range of STMT at the end of the path being analyzed.
> > +//
> > +// See notes in range_of_expr as to what are considered valid queries.
> >
> >  bool
> >  path_range_query::range_of_stmt (vrange &r, gimple *stmt, tree)
> > diff --git a/gcc/gimple-range-path.h b/gcc/gimple-range-path.h
> > index 3cb794e34a9..61a7d0f656e 100644
> > --- a/gcc/gimple-range-path.h
> > +++ b/gcc/gimple-range-path.h
> > @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ public:
> >    void debug ();
> >
> >  private:
> > -  bool internal_range_of_expr (vrange &r, tree name, gimple *);
> > +  bool internal_range_of_expr (vrange &r, tree name, basic_block);
> >    bool defined_outside_path (tree name);
> >    void range_on_path_entry (vrange &r, tree name);
> >    path_oracle *get_path_oracle () { return (path_oracle *)m_oracle; }
> > @@ -113,6 +113,11 @@ private:
> >    // True if m_ranger was allocated in this class and must be freed at
> >    // destruction.
> >    bool m_alloced_ranger;
> > +
> > +// Once the ranges for the exit dependencies have been pre-calculated,
> > +// the path is considered finalized and this is set to TRUE.
> > +// Otherwise, the path is being analyzed.
> > +  bool m_path_finalized;
> >  };
> >
> >  #endif // GCC_TREE_SSA_THREADSOLVER_H
> > diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-threadedge.cc b/gcc/tree-ssa-threadedge.cc
> > index e64e4f209f7..213796c10cc 100644
> > --- a/gcc/tree-ssa-threadedge.cc
> > +++ b/gcc/tree-ssa-threadedge.cc
> > @@ -451,6 +451,7 @@ jump_threader::simplify_control_stmt_condition (edge e, gimple *stmt)
> >                  possible, the simplified value will be a CASE_LABEL_EXPR of
> >                  the label that is proven to be taken.  */
> >               gswitch *dummy_switch = as_a<gswitch *> (gimple_copy (stmt));
> > +             gimple_set_bb (dummy_switch, NULL);
>
> I think it's not wrong to say the stmt is in the block though
>
> >               gimple_switch_set_index (dummy_switch, cached_lhs);
> >               cached_lhs = m_simplifier->simplify (dummy_switch, stmt, e->src,
> >                                                    m_state);
> > --
> > 2.37.1
> >
>


      reply	other threads:[~2022-08-17 16:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-16 13:59 Aldy Hernandez
2022-08-16 14:12 ` Richard Biener
2022-08-17 16:14   ` Aldy Hernandez [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAGm3qMWBX1XN=1yqThBiF1-z-h5hFhEyWbDe2mG9D-8hd8STmQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=aldyh@redhat.com \
    --cc=amacleod@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).