From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81CD83858436 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 23:59:12 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 81CD83858436 Received: from mail-lf1-f69.google.com (mail-lf1-f69.google.com [209.85.167.69]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-242-2KAOu2UNPwmRvCHsd3O8YA-1; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 19:59:10 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 2KAOu2UNPwmRvCHsd3O8YA-1 Received: by mail-lf1-f69.google.com with SMTP id x7-20020a056512130700b003fd1a7424a8so4668450lfu.5 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 16:59:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=hYR1zFwXmS7xobWVWVA5b5K0AreQeG9XKh9N+Sig5a4=; b=yIGyMBhBs00eREqLFBUoMi1nSE9zXMxNQJMR56DiUPVNlDCKoNKLlKUhg8xmieixp8 B6G06n4Uq+sbew5DhB2Zn4eLx/hJmRkVQ5gkDfuYs9iuMhuAxEwjSrudk/iEIKKPxbP2 JHdTyCLHOiJW+5l/xlO8IEU6o9KBWQP923Z/tZhEGNUaqStfYlkwPFj8z/qr9p/oDJ40 5ol3BINw+d/EOwQ4PkUsmTEC1BEilpl0+7oMuXdCF6gvHzJtBdjoDz99NWBK/ITdEY5Q hGFv/dOBQ9KdKi3h8vbldVPnafy4DsGE02pIgc0LERQASvIxvPKe4+vIt8/XYTQgudRj r0+A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531TFNni0Ueb/TXm88Jm/QbQuF9252h0KEjiOiXbWi4qXQYTmWNm C/6CKRt/i+Vc+TnT3PgI1/9DNhUnExKfPfIyURUUvkjKCTmQ+RZ3FURvA8xdHfzGYpyijZnJPJp WBJULucfPZo6ETHmD8kMoY/MbScF9S7vaJw== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9bd6:: with SMTP id w22mr14164771ljj.339.1635551948944; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 16:59:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwhH6l36PeVea2Hx5wfp2VSrgMN3ASCEN+H9pHllY1JbifrFfTmSdXw6tBnBHBHdCT2TjuhgGwKFRrObCb42QU= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9bd6:: with SMTP id w22mr14164752ljj.339.1635551948703; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 16:59:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211028152446.522454-1-aldyh@redhat.com> <2955bfb9bb7568e4eced38d48ed42ff2bc4ec7de.camel@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <2955bfb9bb7568e4eced38d48ed42ff2bc4ec7de.camel@redhat.com> From: Aldy Hernandez Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2021 01:58:57 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove VRP threader passes in exchange for better threading pre-VRP. To: David Malcolm Cc: Jeff Law , GCC patches X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 23:59:14 -0000 Yes as well as anything ASSERT related in the forward threader. That'll be a follow-up patch. Aldy On Fri, Oct 29, 2021, 22:58 David Malcolm wrote: > On Thu, 2021-10-28 at 17:24 +0200, Aldy Hernandez via Gcc-patches > wrote: > > [...snip...] > > > gcc/ChangeLog: > > > > * passes.def: Replace the pass_thread_jumps before VRP* with > > pass_thread_jumps_full. Remove all pass_vrp_threader > > instances. > > Given that you're deleting all pass_vrp_threader instances, will you be > deleting make_pass_vrp_threader and class pass_vrp_threader once the > dust settles? (and thus execute_vrp_threader, etc?) > > Dave > >