From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 170523858292 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 08:51:22 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 170523858292 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1666342281; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=MK/Lot/Cn0ZqPpYOAWJ3vfsStGRQpTBGL3s0SjGupBw=; b=d1AjkbzFjbgaz6Uwf/pwnfUGPAFU/nd5cO8gWD4i/0fZBZiyCkMeuByAyol2nIeJbwo+Cl onit/gJJlgCiQV0fZMYJ3Jl5dtm3hle0DgIJal2jAiRJh5PJeJNTCC0lRo+wflKPdtuXd6 zu49pUSwxZTuTxiqAikiftg3LnJzdVw= Received: from mail-yw1-f198.google.com (mail-yw1-f198.google.com [209.85.128.198]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id us-mta-561-e8dVZuW-MjyQ83O8Q6TzCA-1; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 04:51:19 -0400 X-MC-Unique: e8dVZuW-MjyQ83O8Q6TzCA-1 Received: by mail-yw1-f198.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-368036d93abso22258007b3.18 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 01:51:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=MK/Lot/Cn0ZqPpYOAWJ3vfsStGRQpTBGL3s0SjGupBw=; b=fvpqoZ8q1vGSQeRsMYWVcBi3SwWcIpqzP9G3KQoZSNh4nYsPaeggA81u4eH763MOHw rsHIKDgql+u+8piPMe7cwrMMiGO6bJd2YJD0plPaqQoVz7nJXTMfkcVzMr5SuRauhBiC +ZSACrmi+gB33+jm2qfFWmckn8ghWQOtF8O8mjJbtvPbYfmawf8qlhYyRjOHS3bkh2XG x0y4GdY+3TXvArhz7TG7X5wK8yXjGBaCzldUA788Wlen2RguQRFOel6p/yj4LoCemMbt g8kpyV6LHg6k3B9HNJQ47Ip2ddHkOn19DTkh4iUpefQxcRUHg0t0IKOqwt+p+eSHtz7W 05lQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf0ItK4pWYY6i7PYCipnmO+BiYjyo2SX3tzThSOZT5M+VnsIY5Xi KofhbNTWZy9Kg6mXU/+F4tz4nM5c/6AzVl4MgiHpceIXrRtnqIbmj/crOVZUzC2MfVCsBtyySSI IfGvdgDuDFgT1qrpIgdksST409NLbPS9A4w== X-Received: by 2002:a0d:cdc2:0:b0:34d:101b:53c with SMTP id p185-20020a0dcdc2000000b0034d101b053cmr16229032ywd.444.1666342279255; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 01:51:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM6yWAbtECJLBwCWv6qQ/nQba1tx6G4W5o3XSprw1y7GqU75+tiwa2N6E/ySotpRhyNj1SJ2FNoSYLUoWuUpMxg= X-Received: by 2002:a0d:cdc2:0:b0:34d:101b:53c with SMTP id p185-20020a0dcdc2000000b0034d101b053cmr16229019ywd.444.1666342278989; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 01:51:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20221011083137.336470-1-aldyh@redhat.com> <878rlej3o6.fsf@euler.schwinge.homeip.net> <87o7uafqyf.fsf@dem-tschwing-1.ger.mentorg.com> <87y1taencs.fsf@dem-tschwing-1.ger.mentorg.com> <87mt9qe1wf.fsf@dem-tschwing-1.ger.mentorg.com> <875ygdefm1.fsf@dem-tschwing-1.ger.mentorg.com> In-Reply-To: <875ygdefm1.fsf@dem-tschwing-1.ger.mentorg.com> From: Aldy Hernandez Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 10:51:08 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Add 'gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr107195-3.c' [PR107195] (was: Add 'c-c++-common/torture/pr107195-1.c' [PR107195] (was: [COMMITTED] [PR107195] Set range to zero when nonzero mask is 0.)) To: Thomas Schwinge Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Andrew MacLeod X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 10:38 AM Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > Hi! > > On 2022-10-21T00:44:30+0200, Aldy Hernandez wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 9:22 PM Thomas Schwinge wrote: > >> "Add 'gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr107195-3.c' [PR107195]" attached? > > > > I see 7 different tests in this patch. Did the 6 that pass, fail > > before my patch for PR107195 and are now working? Cause unless > > that's the case, they shouldn't be in a test named pr107195-3.c, but > > somewhere else. > > That's correct; I should've mentioned that I had verified this. With the > code changes of commit r13-3217-gc4d15dddf6b9eacb36f535807ad2ee364af46e04 > "[PR107195] Set range to zero when nonzero mask is 0" reverted, we get: > > PASS: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr107195-3.c (test for excess errors) > FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr107195-3.c scan-tree-dump-times dom3 "gimple_call FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr107195-3.c scan-tree-dump-times dom3 "gimple_call FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr107195-3.c scan-tree-dump-times dom3 "gimple_call FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr107195-3.c scan-tree-dump-times dom3 "gimple_call FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr107195-3.c scan-tree-dump-times dom3 "gimple_call FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr107195-3.c scan-tree-dump-times dom3 "gimple_call > ..., and in 'pr107195-3.c.196t.dom3' instead see two calls of each > 'foo[...]' function. > > That's with this... > > > I see there's one XFAILed test in your patch > > ... XFAILed test case removed, see the attached > "Add 'gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr107195-3.c' [PR107195]"; > OK now to push that version? OK, thanks.