public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] libstdc++: Add mem_order_hle_acquire/release to atomic.h v2
@ 2013-01-14  6:06 Andi Kleen
  2013-01-14 12:30 ` Jonathan Wakely
  2013-01-21 14:06 ` Jakub Jelinek
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andi Kleen @ 2013-01-14  6:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-patches; +Cc: libstdc++, jwakely.gcc, Andi Kleen

From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>

The underlying compiler supports additional __ATOMIC_HLE_ACQUIRE/RELEASE
memmodel flags for TSX, but this was not exposed to the C++ wrapper.
Handle it there.

These are additional flags, so some of assert checks need to mask
off the flags before checking the memory model type.

This is a reworked version over the version last year, including
using operator overloading as suggested by Jonathan Wakely
and a real test case

Needs the earlier __atomic_clear/store HLE fix patch to make
the test case succeed.

Passes bootstrap and testsuite on x86_64-linux.

libstdc++/:
2013-01-12  Andi Kleen  <ak@linux.intel.com>
	    Jonathan Wakely  <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>

        PR libstdc++/55223
	* include/bits/atomic_base.h (__memory_order_modifier): Add
        __memory_order_mask, __memory_order_modifier_mask,
	__memory_order_hle_acquire, __memory_order_hle_release.
	(operator|,operator&): Add.
	(__cmpexch_failure_order):  Rename to __cmpexch_failure_order2.
	(__cmpexch_failure_order): Add.
        (clear, store, load, compare_exchange_weak, compare_exchange_strong):
        Handle flags.
	* testsuite/29_atomics/atomic_flag/test_and_set/explicit-hle.cc:
	Add.
---
 libstdc++-v3/include/bits/atomic_base.h            |  142 +++++++++++++-------
 .../atomic_flag/test_and_set/explicit-hle.cc       |  120 +++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 217 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 libstdc++-v3/testsuite/29_atomics/atomic_flag/test_and_set/explicit-hle.cc

diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/atomic_base.h b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/atomic_base.h
index 8ce5553..d69bc76 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/atomic_base.h
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/atomic_base.h
@@ -59,14 +59,41 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
       memory_order_seq_cst
     } memory_order;
 
+  enum __memory_order_modifier
+    {
+      __memory_order_mask          = 0x0ffff,
+      __memory_order_modifier_mask = 0xffff0000,
+      __memory_order_hle_acquire   = 0x10000,
+      __memory_order_hle_release   = 0x20000
+    };
+
+  constexpr memory_order
+  operator|(memory_order __m, __memory_order_modifier __mod)
+  {
+    return memory_order(__m | int(__mod));
+  }
+
+  constexpr memory_order
+  operator&(memory_order __m, __memory_order_modifier __mod)
+  {
+    return memory_order(__m & int(__mod));
+  }
+
   // Drop release ordering as per [atomics.types.operations.req]/21
   constexpr memory_order
-  __cmpexch_failure_order(memory_order __m) noexcept
+  __cmpexch_failure_order2(memory_order __m) noexcept
   {
     return __m == memory_order_acq_rel ? memory_order_acquire
       : __m == memory_order_release ? memory_order_relaxed : __m;
   }
 
+  constexpr memory_order
+  __cmpexch_failure_order(memory_order __m) noexcept
+  {
+    return memory_order(__cmpexch_failure_order2(__m & __memory_order_mask)
+      | (__m & __memory_order_modifier_mask));
+  }
+
   inline void
   atomic_thread_fence(memory_order __m) noexcept
   { __atomic_thread_fence(__m); }
@@ -268,9 +295,10 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
     void
     clear(memory_order __m = memory_order_seq_cst) noexcept
     {
-      __glibcxx_assert(__m != memory_order_consume);
-      __glibcxx_assert(__m != memory_order_acquire);
-      __glibcxx_assert(__m != memory_order_acq_rel);
+      memory_order __b = __m & __memory_order_mask;
+      __glibcxx_assert(__b != memory_order_consume);
+      __glibcxx_assert(__b != memory_order_acquire);
+      __glibcxx_assert(__b != memory_order_acq_rel);
 
       __atomic_clear (&_M_i, __m);
     }
@@ -278,9 +306,10 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
     void
     clear(memory_order __m = memory_order_seq_cst) volatile noexcept
     {
-      __glibcxx_assert(__m != memory_order_consume);
-      __glibcxx_assert(__m != memory_order_acquire);
-      __glibcxx_assert(__m != memory_order_acq_rel);
+      memory_order __b = __m & __memory_order_mask;
+      __glibcxx_assert(__b != memory_order_consume);
+      __glibcxx_assert(__b != memory_order_acquire);
+      __glibcxx_assert(__b != memory_order_acq_rel);
 
       __atomic_clear (&_M_i, __m);
     }
@@ -431,9 +460,10 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
       void
       store(__int_type __i, memory_order __m = memory_order_seq_cst) noexcept
       {
-	__glibcxx_assert(__m != memory_order_acquire);
-	__glibcxx_assert(__m != memory_order_acq_rel);
-	__glibcxx_assert(__m != memory_order_consume);
+        memory_order __b = __m & __memory_order_mask;
+	__glibcxx_assert(__b != memory_order_acquire);
+	__glibcxx_assert(__b != memory_order_acq_rel);
+	__glibcxx_assert(__b != memory_order_consume);
 
 	__atomic_store_n(&_M_i, __i, __m);
       }
@@ -442,9 +472,10 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
       store(__int_type __i,
 	    memory_order __m = memory_order_seq_cst) volatile noexcept
       {
-	__glibcxx_assert(__m != memory_order_acquire);
-	__glibcxx_assert(__m != memory_order_acq_rel);
-	__glibcxx_assert(__m != memory_order_consume);
+        memory_order __b = __m & __memory_order_mask;
+	__glibcxx_assert(__b != memory_order_acquire);
+	__glibcxx_assert(__b != memory_order_acq_rel);
+	__glibcxx_assert(__b != memory_order_consume);
 
 	__atomic_store_n(&_M_i, __i, __m);
       }
@@ -452,8 +483,9 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
       __int_type
       load(memory_order __m = memory_order_seq_cst) const noexcept
       {
-	__glibcxx_assert(__m != memory_order_release);
-	__glibcxx_assert(__m != memory_order_acq_rel);
+       memory_order __b = __m & __memory_order_mask;
+	__glibcxx_assert(__b != memory_order_release);
+	__glibcxx_assert(__b != memory_order_acq_rel);
 
 	return __atomic_load_n(&_M_i, __m);
       }
@@ -461,8 +493,9 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
       __int_type
       load(memory_order __m = memory_order_seq_cst) const volatile noexcept
       {
-	__glibcxx_assert(__m != memory_order_release);
-	__glibcxx_assert(__m != memory_order_acq_rel);
+        memory_order __b = __m & __memory_order_mask;
+	__glibcxx_assert(__b != memory_order_release);
+	__glibcxx_assert(__b != memory_order_acq_rel);
 
 	return __atomic_load_n(&_M_i, __m);
       }
@@ -486,9 +519,11 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
       compare_exchange_weak(__int_type& __i1, __int_type __i2,
 			    memory_order __m1, memory_order __m2) noexcept
       {
-	__glibcxx_assert(__m2 != memory_order_release);
-	__glibcxx_assert(__m2 != memory_order_acq_rel);
-	__glibcxx_assert(__m2 <= __m1);
+       memory_order __b2 = __m2 & __memory_order_mask;
+       memory_order __b1 = __m1 & __memory_order_mask;
+	__glibcxx_assert(__b2 != memory_order_release);
+	__glibcxx_assert(__b2 != memory_order_acq_rel);
+	__glibcxx_assert(__b2 <= __b1);
 
 	return __atomic_compare_exchange_n(&_M_i, &__i1, __i2, 1, __m1, __m2);
       }
@@ -498,9 +533,11 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
 			    memory_order __m1,
 			    memory_order __m2) volatile noexcept
       {
-	__glibcxx_assert(__m2 != memory_order_release);
-	__glibcxx_assert(__m2 != memory_order_acq_rel);
-	__glibcxx_assert(__m2 <= __m1);
+       memory_order __b2 = __m2 & __memory_order_mask;
+       memory_order __b1 = __m1 & __memory_order_mask;
+	__glibcxx_assert(__b2 != memory_order_release);
+	__glibcxx_assert(__b2 != memory_order_acq_rel);
+	__glibcxx_assert(__b2 <= __b1);
 
 	return __atomic_compare_exchange_n(&_M_i, &__i1, __i2, 1, __m1, __m2);
       }
@@ -525,9 +562,11 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
       compare_exchange_strong(__int_type& __i1, __int_type __i2,
 			      memory_order __m1, memory_order __m2) noexcept
       {
-	__glibcxx_assert(__m2 != memory_order_release);
-	__glibcxx_assert(__m2 != memory_order_acq_rel);
-	__glibcxx_assert(__m2 <= __m1);
+        memory_order __b2 = __m2 & __memory_order_mask;
+        memory_order __b1 = __m1 & __memory_order_mask;
+	__glibcxx_assert(__b2 != memory_order_release);
+	__glibcxx_assert(__b2 != memory_order_acq_rel);
+	__glibcxx_assert(__b2 <= __b1);
 
 	return __atomic_compare_exchange_n(&_M_i, &__i1, __i2, 0, __m1, __m2);
       }
@@ -537,9 +576,12 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
 			      memory_order __m1,
 			      memory_order __m2) volatile noexcept
       {
-	__glibcxx_assert(__m2 != memory_order_release);
-	__glibcxx_assert(__m2 != memory_order_acq_rel);
-	__glibcxx_assert(__m2 <= __m1);
+        memory_order __b2 = __m2 & __memory_order_mask;
+        memory_order __b1 = __m1 & __memory_order_mask;
+
+	__glibcxx_assert(__b2 != memory_order_release);
+	__glibcxx_assert(__b2 != memory_order_acq_rel);
+	__glibcxx_assert(__b2 <= __b1);
 
 	return __atomic_compare_exchange_n(&_M_i, &__i1, __i2, 0, __m1, __m2);
       }
@@ -726,9 +768,11 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
       store(__pointer_type __p,
 	    memory_order __m = memory_order_seq_cst) noexcept
       {
-	__glibcxx_assert(__m != memory_order_acquire);
-	__glibcxx_assert(__m != memory_order_acq_rel);
-	__glibcxx_assert(__m != memory_order_consume);
+        memory_order __b = __m & __memory_order_mask;
+
+	__glibcxx_assert(__b != memory_order_acquire);
+	__glibcxx_assert(__b != memory_order_acq_rel);
+	__glibcxx_assert(__b != memory_order_consume);
 
 	__atomic_store_n(&_M_p, __p, __m);
       }
@@ -737,9 +781,10 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
       store(__pointer_type __p,
 	    memory_order __m = memory_order_seq_cst) volatile noexcept
       {
-	__glibcxx_assert(__m != memory_order_acquire);
-	__glibcxx_assert(__m != memory_order_acq_rel);
-	__glibcxx_assert(__m != memory_order_consume);
+        memory_order __b = __m & __memory_order_mask;
+	__glibcxx_assert(__b != memory_order_acquire);
+	__glibcxx_assert(__b != memory_order_acq_rel);
+	__glibcxx_assert(__b != memory_order_consume);
 
 	__atomic_store_n(&_M_p, __p, __m);
       }
@@ -747,8 +792,9 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
       __pointer_type
       load(memory_order __m = memory_order_seq_cst) const noexcept
       {
-	__glibcxx_assert(__m != memory_order_release);
-	__glibcxx_assert(__m != memory_order_acq_rel);
+        memory_order __b = __m & __memory_order_mask;
+	__glibcxx_assert(__b != memory_order_release);
+	__glibcxx_assert(__b != memory_order_acq_rel);
 
 	return __atomic_load_n(&_M_p, __m);
       }
@@ -756,8 +802,9 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
       __pointer_type
       load(memory_order __m = memory_order_seq_cst) const volatile noexcept
       {
-	__glibcxx_assert(__m != memory_order_release);
-	__glibcxx_assert(__m != memory_order_acq_rel);
+        memory_order __b = __m & __memory_order_mask;
+	__glibcxx_assert(__b != memory_order_release);
+	__glibcxx_assert(__b != memory_order_acq_rel);
 
 	return __atomic_load_n(&_M_p, __m);
       }
@@ -782,9 +829,11 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
 			      memory_order __m1,
 			      memory_order __m2) noexcept
       {
-	__glibcxx_assert(__m2 != memory_order_release);
-	__glibcxx_assert(__m2 != memory_order_acq_rel);
-	__glibcxx_assert(__m2 <= __m1);
+        memory_order __b2 = __m2 & __memory_order_mask;
+        memory_order __b1 = __m1 & __memory_order_mask;
+	__glibcxx_assert(__b2 != memory_order_release);
+	__glibcxx_assert(__b2 != memory_order_acq_rel);
+	__glibcxx_assert(__b2 <= __b1);
 
 	return __atomic_compare_exchange_n(&_M_p, &__p1, __p2, 0, __m1, __m2);
       }
@@ -794,9 +843,12 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION
 			      memory_order __m1,
 			      memory_order __m2) volatile noexcept
       {
-	__glibcxx_assert(__m2 != memory_order_release);
-	__glibcxx_assert(__m2 != memory_order_acq_rel);
-	__glibcxx_assert(__m2 <= __m1);
+        memory_order __b2 = __m2 & __memory_order_mask;
+        memory_order __b1 = __m1 & __memory_order_mask;
+
+	__glibcxx_assert(__b2 != memory_order_release);
+	__glibcxx_assert(__b2 != memory_order_acq_rel);
+	__glibcxx_assert(__b2 <= __b1);
 
 	return __atomic_compare_exchange_n(&_M_p, &__p1, __p2, 0, __m1, __m2);
       }
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/29_atomics/atomic_flag/test_and_set/explicit-hle.cc b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/29_atomics/atomic_flag/test_and_set/explicit-hle.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..916a5e2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/29_atomics/atomic_flag/test_and_set/explicit-hle.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,120 @@
+// { dg-options "-std=gnu++0x" }
+// { dg-do compile { target i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } }
+// { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\(xacquire\|\.byte.*0xf2\)" 14 } }
+// { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\(xrelease\|\.byte.*0xf3\)" 14 } }
+
+// Copyright (C) 2008, 2009, 2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+//
+// This file is part of the GNU ISO C++ Library.  This library is free
+// software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the
+// terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the
+// Free Software Foundation; either version 3, or (at your option)
+// any later version.
+
+// This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+// but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+// MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
+// GNU General Public License for more details.
+
+// You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along
+// with this library; see the file COPYING3.  If not see
+// <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
+
+#include <atomic>
+
+#define ACQ memory_order_acquire | __memory_order_hle_acquire
+#define REL memory_order_release | __memory_order_hle_release
+
+int main()
+{
+  unsigned zero, one;
+  using namespace std;
+  atomic_flag af = ATOMIC_FLAG_INIT;
+
+  if (!af.test_and_set(ACQ))
+    af.clear(REL);
+
+  atomic_uint au = ATOMIC_VAR_INIT(0);
+
+  if (au.exchange(1, ACQ))
+    au.store(0, REL);
+
+  if (au.exchange(1, ACQ))
+    au.exchange(0, REL);
+
+  zero = 0;
+  one = 1;
+  if (au.compare_exchange_weak(zero, 1, ACQ, memory_order_consume))
+    au.compare_exchange_weak(one, 0, REL, memory_order_consume);
+
+  zero = 0;
+  one = 1;
+  if (au.compare_exchange_strong(zero, 1, ACQ, memory_order_consume))
+    au.compare_exchange_strong(one, 0, REL, memory_order_consume);
+
+  if (!au.fetch_add(1, ACQ))
+    au.fetch_add(-1, REL);
+
+  if (!au.fetch_sub(1, ACQ))
+    au.fetch_sub(-1, REL);
+
+#if 0 /* broken in underlying target */
+  if (!au.fetch_and(1, ACQ))
+    au.fetch_and(-1, REL);
+
+  if (!au.fetch_or(1, ACQ))
+    au.fetch_or(-1, REL);
+
+  if (!au.fetch_xor(1, ACQ))
+    au.fetch_xor(-1, REL);
+
+  if (!au.fetch_nand(1, ACQ))
+    au.fetch_nand(-1, REL);
+#endif
+
+  volatile atomic_flag vaf = ATOMIC_FLAG_INIT;
+
+  if (!vaf.test_and_set(ACQ))
+    vaf.clear(REL);
+
+  volatile atomic_uint vau = ATOMIC_VAR_INIT(0);
+
+  if (!vau.exchange(1, ACQ))
+    vau.store(0, REL);
+
+  if (!vau.exchange(1, ACQ))
+    vau.exchange(0, REL);
+
+  zero = 0;
+  one = 1;
+  if (vau.compare_exchange_weak(zero, 1, ACQ, memory_order_consume))
+    vau.compare_exchange_weak(one, 0, REL, memory_order_consume);
+
+  zero = 0;
+  one = 1;
+  if (vau.compare_exchange_strong(zero, 1, ACQ, memory_order_consume))
+    vau.compare_exchange_strong(one, 0, REL, memory_order_consume);
+
+  if (!vau.fetch_add(1, ACQ))
+    vau.fetch_add(-1, REL);
+
+  if (!vau.fetch_sub(1, ACQ))
+    vau.fetch_sub(-1, REL);
+
+#if 0 /* broken in underlying target */
+
+  if (!vau.fetch_and(1, ACQ))
+    vau.fetch_and(-1, REL);
+
+  if (!vau.fetch_or(1, ACQ))
+    vau.fetch_or(-1, REL);
+
+  if (!vau.fetch_xor(1, ACQ))
+    vau.fetch_xor(-1, REL);
+
+  if (!vau.fetch_nand(1, ACQ))
+    vau.fetch_nand(-1, REL);
+#endif
+
+  return 0;
+}
-- 
1.7.10.4

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Add mem_order_hle_acquire/release to atomic.h v2
  2013-01-14  6:06 [PATCH] libstdc++: Add mem_order_hle_acquire/release to atomic.h v2 Andi Kleen
@ 2013-01-14 12:30 ` Jonathan Wakely
  2013-01-21 14:06 ` Jakub Jelinek
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Wakely @ 2013-01-14 12:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andi Kleen; +Cc: gcc-patches, libstdc++, Andi Kleen

On 14 January 2013 06:06, Andi Kleen  wrote:
>
> The underlying compiler supports additional __ATOMIC_HLE_ACQUIRE/RELEASE
> memmodel flags for TSX, but this was not exposed to the C++ wrapper.
> Handle it there.
>
> These are additional flags, so some of assert checks need to mask
> off the flags before checking the memory model type.
>
> This is a reworked version over the version last year, including
> using operator overloading as suggested by Jonathan Wakely
> and a real test case
>
> Needs the earlier __atomic_clear/store HLE fix patch to make
> the test case succeed.
>
> Passes bootstrap and testsuite on x86_64-linux.

This looks good, thanks for reworking it.

I think the new testcase should only have 2013 in the copyright dates,
and does atomic_base.h need 2013 added?

As the earlier version was first posted some time ago I think it's OK
even though the trunk's now in release branch mode.  Please wait 24
hours in case anyone else objects and if not it can be committed.

Thanks.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Add mem_order_hle_acquire/release to atomic.h v2
  2013-01-14  6:06 [PATCH] libstdc++: Add mem_order_hle_acquire/release to atomic.h v2 Andi Kleen
  2013-01-14 12:30 ` Jonathan Wakely
@ 2013-01-21 14:06 ` Jakub Jelinek
  2013-01-22 17:01   ` [PATCH] libstdc++: Fix up explicit-hle.cc test Jakub Jelinek
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Jelinek @ 2013-01-21 14:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andi Kleen; +Cc: gcc-patches, libstdc++, jwakely.gcc, Andi Kleen

On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 10:06:05PM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
> 2013-01-12  Andi Kleen  <ak@linux.intel.com>
> 	    Jonathan Wakely  <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
> 
>         PR libstdc++/55223
> 	* testsuite/29_atomics/atomic_flag/test_and_set/explicit-hle.cc:
> 	Add.

The test is broken on i?86-linux,

> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/29_atomics/atomic_flag/test_and_set/explicit-hle.cc
> @@ -0,0 +1,120 @@
> +// { dg-options "-std=gnu++0x" }

1) you need // { dg-additional-options "-march=i486" { target ia32 } }
   or something similar, otherwise for a pure i386 target it will not work right

> +// { dg-do compile { target i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } }
> +// { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\(xacquire\|\.byte.*0xf2\)" 14 } }
> +// { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\(xrelease\|\.byte.*0xf3\)" 14 } }

2) \.byte.*0xf needs to be replaced by \.byte\[^\n\r]*0xf
   otherwise it will happily match say
        .byte   0                                                                                                                                  
        .uleb128 0x2d                                                                                                                              
        .long   0xf23                                                                                                                              
   in .debug_info

3) I guess you want to add "-g0 -fno-exceptions -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables"
   to double check that .byte 0xf2 or .byte 0xf3 won't suddenly appear in
   .debug_* or .eh_frame sections.

	Jakub

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] libstdc++: Fix up explicit-hle.cc test
  2013-01-21 14:06 ` Jakub Jelinek
@ 2013-01-22 17:01   ` Jakub Jelinek
  2013-01-22 17:13     ` Jonathan Wakely
  2013-01-22 17:23     ` Andi Kleen
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Jelinek @ 2013-01-22 17:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andi Kleen, jwakely.gcc; +Cc: gcc-patches, libstdc++

On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 03:05:45PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 10:06:05PM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > 2013-01-12  Andi Kleen  <ak@linux.intel.com>
> > 	    Jonathan Wakely  <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
> > 
> >         PR libstdc++/55223
> > 	* testsuite/29_atomics/atomic_flag/test_and_set/explicit-hle.cc:
> > 	Add.
> 
> The test is broken on i?86-linux,
> 
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/29_atomics/atomic_flag/test_and_set/explicit-hle.cc
> > @@ -0,0 +1,120 @@
> > +// { dg-options "-std=gnu++0x" }
> 
> 1) you need // { dg-additional-options "-march=i486" { target ia32 } }
>    or something similar, otherwise for a pure i386 target it will not work right
> 
> > +// { dg-do compile { target i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } }
> > +// { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\(xacquire\|\.byte.*0xf2\)" 14 } }
> > +// { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\(xrelease\|\.byte.*0xf3\)" 14 } }
> 
> 2) \.byte.*0xf needs to be replaced by \.byte\[^\n\r]*0xf
>    otherwise it will happily match say
>         .byte   0                                                                                                                                  
>         .uleb128 0x2d                                                                                                                              
>         .long   0xf23                                                                                                                              
>    in .debug_info
> 
> 3) I guess you want to add "-g0 -fno-exceptions -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables"
>    to double check that .byte 0xf2 or .byte 0xf3 won't suddenly appear in
>    .debug_* or .eh_frame sections.

Now in the form of a tested patch (regtested on x86_64-linux and
i686-linux).  Ok for trunk?

dg-additional-options unfortunately isn't supported in libstdc++ testsuite,
so had to use second dg-options, and also the \(, \) were wrong and resulted
in no matches.

2013-01-22  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

	* testsuite/29_atomics/atomic_flag/test_and_set/explicit-hle.cc:
	Tightten scan-assembler-times regexps, add dg-additional-options for
	ia32, add -g0 -fno-exceptions -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables to
	dg-options.

--- libstdc++-v3/testsuite/29_atomics/atomic_flag/test_and_set/explicit-hle.cc.jj	2013-01-21 10:57:10.199935240 +0100
+++ libstdc++-v3/testsuite/29_atomics/atomic_flag/test_and_set/explicit-hle.cc	2013-01-22 14:46:15.851668073 +0100
@@ -1,9 +1,10 @@
-// { dg-options "-std=gnu++0x" }
 // { dg-do compile { target i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } }
-// { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\(xacquire\|\.byte.*0xf2\)" 14 } }
-// { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\(xrelease\|\.byte.*0xf3\)" 14 } }
+// { dg-options "-std=gnu++0x -g0 -fno-exceptions -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables" }
+// { dg-options "-std=gnu++0x -g0 -fno-exceptions -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -march=i486" { target ia32 } }
+// { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "xacquire\|\.byte\[^\n\r]*0xf2" 14 } }
+// { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "xrelease\|\.byte\[^\n\r]*0xf3" 14 } }
 
-// Copyright (C) 2008, 2009, 2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+// Copyright (C) 2008-2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
 //
 // This file is part of the GNU ISO C++ Library.  This library is free
 // software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the


	Jakub

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Fix up explicit-hle.cc test
  2013-01-22 17:01   ` [PATCH] libstdc++: Fix up explicit-hle.cc test Jakub Jelinek
@ 2013-01-22 17:13     ` Jonathan Wakely
  2013-01-22 17:23     ` Andi Kleen
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Wakely @ 2013-01-22 17:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jakub Jelinek; +Cc: Andi Kleen, gcc-patches, libstdc++

On 22 January 2013 17:00, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> Now in the form of a tested patch (regtested on x86_64-linux and
> i686-linux).  Ok for trunk?

OK, thanks.

> dg-additional-options unfortunately isn't supported in libstdc++ testsuite,
> so had to use second dg-options, and also the \(, \) were wrong and resulted
> in no matches.

Kai has a forthcoming patch to add dg-additional-options:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-01/msg00945.html

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] libstdc++: Fix up explicit-hle.cc test
  2013-01-22 17:01   ` [PATCH] libstdc++: Fix up explicit-hle.cc test Jakub Jelinek
  2013-01-22 17:13     ` Jonathan Wakely
@ 2013-01-22 17:23     ` Andi Kleen
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andi Kleen @ 2013-01-22 17:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jakub Jelinek; +Cc: Andi Kleen, jwakely.gcc, gcc-patches, libstdc++

> Now in the form of a tested patch (regtested on x86_64-linux and
> i686-linux).  Ok for trunk?
> 
> dg-additional-options unfortunately isn't supported in libstdc++ testsuite,
> so had to use second dg-options, and also the \(, \) were wrong and resulted
> in no matches.

Looks good to me (but cannot approve). Thanks Jakub for fixing this up.

-Andi

> 
> 2013-01-22  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>
> 
> 	* testsuite/29_atomics/atomic_flag/test_and_set/explicit-hle.cc:
> 	Tightten scan-assembler-times regexps, add dg-additional-options for
> 	ia32, add -g0 -fno-exceptions -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables to
> 	dg-options.
> 
> --- libstdc++-v3/testsuite/29_atomics/atomic_flag/test_and_set/explicit-hle.cc.jj	2013-01-21 10:57:10.199935240 +0100
> +++ libstdc++-v3/testsuite/29_atomics/atomic_flag/test_and_set/explicit-hle.cc	2013-01-22 14:46:15.851668073 +0100
> @@ -1,9 +1,10 @@
> -// { dg-options "-std=gnu++0x" }
>  // { dg-do compile { target i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } }
> -// { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\(xacquire\|\.byte.*0xf2\)" 14 } }
> -// { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "\(xrelease\|\.byte.*0xf3\)" 14 } }
> +// { dg-options "-std=gnu++0x -g0 -fno-exceptions -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables" }
> +// { dg-options "-std=gnu++0x -g0 -fno-exceptions -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -march=i486" { target ia32 } }
> +// { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "xacquire\|\.byte\[^\n\r]*0xf2" 14 } }
> +// { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "xrelease\|\.byte\[^\n\r]*0xf3" 14 } }
>  
> -// Copyright (C) 2008, 2009, 2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> +// Copyright (C) 2008-2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>  //
>  // This file is part of the GNU ISO C++ Library.  This library is free
>  // software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the
> 
> 
> 	Jakub
> 

-- 
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2013-01-22 17:23 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-01-14  6:06 [PATCH] libstdc++: Add mem_order_hle_acquire/release to atomic.h v2 Andi Kleen
2013-01-14 12:30 ` Jonathan Wakely
2013-01-21 14:06 ` Jakub Jelinek
2013-01-22 17:01   ` [PATCH] libstdc++: Fix up explicit-hle.cc test Jakub Jelinek
2013-01-22 17:13     ` Jonathan Wakely
2013-01-22 17:23     ` Andi Kleen

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).