From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-469479-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 73627 invoked by alias); 18 Dec 2017 17:58:26 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 73570 invoked by uid 89); 18 Dec 2017 17:58:25 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=
X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients
X-HELO: mail-pg0-f54.google.com
Received: from mail-pg0-f54.google.com (HELO mail-pg0-f54.google.com) (74.125.83.54) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 17:58:24 +0000
Received: by mail-pg0-f54.google.com with SMTP id k15so9445823pgr.7;        Mon, 18 Dec 2017 09:58:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date         :message-id:subject:to:cc;        bh=YvlAlFmR5UqwpVf3YwYe2xGAh2YKA7zSwdBxiS1eugY=;        b=J2MveKrxYk8a2PLDAH9Xhmxl8W8EWE3Ei6TC1c5ocXpoZErgME9sgMTqGwF2a53uwG         ZmjPyudx0Vs0NeIrJHa9uG1JIuO5bDiKG7KbLvkrCwN7EPohkyAnamvTDJVd86H/yabb         G79ot3l/H9RSu5vQLdgdimClzNMsb13zFq+tdINqaPnOO/IWY5yKWrnJmWdBIoqcOldv         g6fF2DEZEf0B3mKn5Zhgg6vysNOsFh4lEjDSq23HOyl0Mo/cubn6EaUxmf/u4ip3L0Yr         eQ4dW5A+RmqkXY+HoI4GLu5XloNAJ2lGjMt/7XZ46sDk8t78RxKRGE1kqyDZjTPUaGeW         dzFg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mKY+N94ZGBcsmL7sfwRdrNnZx7lhWDSonHhbbuKeTsgChiZXwGQ	H+M+x5Eyhgw+RCTMA1WPF8bizIg1sjyHQpv+sLE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBovy6nxUKHm2cMWnMsb3WW3R2KK2RLLFosAkTlx+FdANNHypChcXSQb2ciQLk8rvLxSNamBFuEAkKibkEc386ys=
X-Received: by 10.99.172.83 with SMTP id z19mr440340pgn.271.1513619902949; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 09:58:22 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.132.228 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 09:58:22 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAFk2RUa8jX4ToMNiRu4aYHLnNscGAci8BH2O8EJqh9AvnvSZrw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFk2RUa8jX4ToMNiRu4aYHLnNscGAci8BH2O8EJqh9AvnvSZrw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 17:58:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAH6eHdQx3+LcgXgT40q+bdh6E+MH9qo4DyyKo1AsgDaKGbBNiw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [v3 PATCH] PR libstdc++/68430
To: Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilainen@gmail.com>
Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, "libstdc++" <libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-SW-Source: 2017-12/txt/msg01182.txt.bz2

On 16 December 2017 at 12:30, Ville Voutilainen  wrote:
> The compiler-powered is_constructible that we have in gcc 8 is powerful
> enough to give the right answer to an is_constructible question
> that would be hard for a pure-library implementation to get right
> in a well-formed fashion. This is just adding a test for it. Tested
> on Linux-PPC64, OK for trunk?

OK, thanks.