From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-322548-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 26701 invoked by alias); 15 Jul 2012 15:10:37 -0000
Received: (qmail 26691 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Jul 2012 15:10:36 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.1 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-lb0-f175.google.com (HELO mail-lb0-f175.google.com) (209.85.217.175)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 15:10:23 +0000
Received: by lbol5 with SMTP id l5so7026661lbo.20        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 08:10:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.152.113.199 with SMTP id ja7mr8259538lab.10.1342365021765; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 08:10:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.27.228 with HTTP; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 08:10:21 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1207151326040.5035@gerinyyl.fvgr>
References: <CAH6eHdSnLMvppxPPn5zajDn6HZ9n2f2YoYE6fGs7PB37rReJng@mail.gmail.com>	<4FFADA23.6050805@redhat.com>	<CAH6eHdT6i3AEceXP7Rph4TZd3d1P8C_b9ODmZ1JnxwZ51bdxVA@mail.gmail.com>	<alpine.LNX.2.00.1207151326040.5035@gerinyyl.fvgr>
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 15:10:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAH6eHdR4zRn1L5ARDC9-i7hH9OM7Gnd0drL2zwsbMXAC5tOtnA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: G++ namespace association extension
From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
To: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>
Cc: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-07/txt/msg00585.txt.bz2

On 15 July 2012 12:26, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jul 2012, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>> Yes, but people should use inline namespaces instead; we should deprecate
>>> this form and then remove it in 4.9.
>>
>>         * doc/extend.texi (Namespace Association): Alter cautionary text.
>
> I think this also should go into the GCC 4.8 release notes
> (gcc-4.8/changes.html)?

I can do that too.  There's no gcc-4.8 dir yet, do I need to copy over
the various other files from the gcc-4.7 dir or can I just create
changes.html and leave the RM to do the rest at the appropriate time?