From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-io1-xd32.google.com (mail-io1-xd32.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d32]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04BD4385701E; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 12:32:20 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 04BD4385701E Received: by mail-io1-xd32.google.com with SMTP id t187so2881051iod.7; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 05:32:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=7uJJKtZukg8GDQMG2zn33SuCDJANi+WxossrpASVPww=; b=gt4tpMcrvZI5v2+bTGQ1nZSNlZLZt7xKOBdcJxgdQNtdPppSR+Jrp/0XvyccZwOE15 DGvQMELMjsTnOh6zh1u7z5yrhJZwSB3lTLM3Szw7s+P4odgg3XRKNkhTbhR9BUyo+Zm/ fdSYySFpa5wCWeDc0iQe2rtkS22Q63RPtd9awe79GZTOgfi+jj4O+ltqOaVAwJiWdUKQ hK2D3oynEX4cAX6SagjEa59ta5sMvrZANc34lvwQIocLEyMqc40l4FmtM1ggfo/lmYF0 DNKkF7u/vc1YHnnGFjaOBwBeVJC8jiQUndaKi6JVZvlyBhQ8BpOWMGryE7bnKdt0oWRw dgKg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532PBF82t6mn+iAQmjgoOYPTBc9dF1UDSdpPwOk0JR0qZ5Owm65I 5lCituMT4VI+E/FCRSfrmbzOGa36BF2DviuKZc8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwrCgBF1YTlzhW8Yzz1pkwxj1cBCPk3Xw6KE+fXPjRdWB1pS0XjTuw3rmW9hI0ujBarHkEQqo1dfPEZxx5h5w4= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:13c7:: with SMTP id i7mr6900482jaj.52.1598099539476; Sat, 22 Aug 2020 05:32:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200819160004.GA11512@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: From: Jonathan Wakely Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 13:32:08 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [committed] libstdc++: Make __int128 meet integer-class requirements [PR 96042] To: JeanHeyd Meneide Cc: "libstdc++" , gcc-patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 12:32:21 -0000 On Sat, 22 Aug 2020 at 13:18, JeanHeyd Meneide wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 8:14 AM Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches > wrote: > > I really wish WG14 would just fix the intmax_t mess so we can make > > them integral types unconditionally. > > We're trying, but we're struggling to reach a good consensus. Almost > nobody's fully agreeing on one /particular/ solution (there's roughly > 3 ideas of what to do). I liked Jens Gustedt's original proposal, it looked perfect to me. I should catch up on WG14 mails to see what the other proposals are and where the discussion is going.