From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11551 invoked by alias); 3 Oct 2011 15:51:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 11532 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Oct 2011 15:51:19 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_40,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-vx0-f175.google.com (HELO mail-vx0-f175.google.com) (209.85.220.175) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Oct 2011 15:51:05 +0000 Received: by vcbfl17 with SMTP id fl17so3351953vcb.20 for ; Mon, 03 Oct 2011 08:51:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.17.4 with SMTP id k4mr2235559pbd.8.1317657063678; Mon, 03 Oct 2011 08:51:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.143.30.6 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Oct 2011 08:51:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20110913154324.4be22faf@shotwell> <4E809F45.2010908@symantec.com> <20110927195930.54e0d0df@shotwell> <4E830B10.8020802@symantec.com> <4E831DF8.9080700@symantec.com> <20110929102215.33af0ba9@shotwell> Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 15:51:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Intrinsics for N2965: Type traits and base classes From: Jonathan Wakely To: Michael Spertus Cc: Benjamin Kosnik , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" , Jason Merrill , "libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-10/txt/msg00105.txt.bz2 On 3 October 2011 02:55, Michael Spertus wrote: > Index: gcc/c-family/c-common.h > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > --- gcc/c-family/c-common.h =A0 =A0 (revision 178892) > +++ gcc/c-family/c-common.h =A0 =A0 (working copy) > @@ -139,7 +139,8 @@ > =A0 RID_IS_LITERAL_TYPE, =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 RID_IS_POD, > =A0 RID_IS_POLYMORPHIC, =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0RID_IS_STD_LAYOUT, > =A0 RID_IS_TRIVIAL, =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0RID_IS_UNION, > - =A0RID_UNDERLYING_TYPE, > + =A0RID_UNDERLYING_TYPE, =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 RID_BASES, > + =A0RID_DIRECT_BASES, Should that be kept in alphabetical order?