From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-367766-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 26356 invoked by alias); 17 May 2014 09:50:44 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 26240 invoked by uid 89); 17 May 2014 09:50:43 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients
X-HELO: mail-lb0-f172.google.com
Received: from mail-lb0-f172.google.com (HELO mail-lb0-f172.google.com) (209.85.217.172) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Sat, 17 May 2014 09:50:41 +0000
Received: by mail-lb0-f172.google.com with SMTP id l4so2697501lbv.31        for <multiple recipients>; Sat, 17 May 2014 02:50:38 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.87.228 with SMTP id bb4mr20927lab.74.1400320238070; Sat, 17 May 2014 02:50:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.125.202 with HTTP; Sat, 17 May 2014 02:50:38 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5376AA41.8020309@codesourcery.com>
References: <5376AA41.8020309@codesourcery.com>
Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 09:50:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAH6eHdTTp-Aifs9WLEEsHeEbJPgJFSNEtf2FoTuEOqt5wztHiA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [patch ping] libstdc++ testsuite cxxflags
From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
To: Sandra Loosemore <sandra@codesourcery.com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, "libstdc++" <libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org>, 	Cesar Philippidis <cesar@codesourcery.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-SW-Source: 2014-05/txt/msg01381.txt.bz2

On 17 May 2014 01:16, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
> It appears that this patch from last fall never got reviewed.
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-10/msg02340.html
>
> Can someone take a look?  I'll commit the patch on Cesar's behalf if it's
> approved.

Libstdc++ patches need to go to the libstdc++ list, which this did, in
a separate mail that broke the threading:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2013-10/msg00224.html
Then archives's inability to thread betweem months broke it again:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2013-11/msg00113.html

I approved it then withdrew that approval:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2013-11/msg00120.html
then the patch got revised:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2013-11/msg00122.html

I'll have to refresh my memory about it.