From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-335718-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 10020 invoked by alias); 18 Jan 2013 13:07:44 -0000
Received: (qmail 10005 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Jan 2013 13:07:43 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.3 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-lb0-f177.google.com (HELO mail-lb0-f177.google.com) (209.85.217.177)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 13:07:37 +0000
Received: by mail-lb0-f177.google.com with SMTP id gm6so537640lbb.22        for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 05:07:35 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.40.3 with SMTP id t3mr3776921lbk.48.1358514455214; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 05:07:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.112.125.71 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 05:07:35 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAEwic4boosSA615X2PzHF-133vyxWnum=U4xm1R5U_3JtVVTNw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAEwic4b-eauMUgi0kvMPYP06pC6Uko7SaSbsYKs7_nJUf+620g@mail.gmail.com>	<CAH6eHdS5FB+nOHLA97=gX0f-fnX6BH0wObObUNwE_PHGbqJ3Ow@mail.gmail.com>	<CAEwic4boosSA615X2PzHF-133vyxWnum=U4xm1R5U_3JtVVTNw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 13:07:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAH6eHdTX2qdza09G-6xJ4mVB-MYFUg20UiApXkBgV1RA4wyGNQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [patch libstdc++]: Fix tests trying to override symbols in shared-library for mingw targets
From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>
To: Kai Tietz <ktietz70@googlemail.com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, "libstdc++" <libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg00961.txt.bz2

On 18 January 2013 12:09, Kai Tietz wrote:
>>> +
>>> +    if { [llength $args] >= 3 } {
>>
>> Is this condition right or should it check for exactly three?
>
> Well, I copied stuff from gcc's testsuite.  As we check some lines
> about for args > 3 and error out, a test for == 3 makes sense, but
> well, >= 3 is fine too.

Ah OK, it's fine as it is then.

Thanks again.