From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11954 invoked by alias); 21 Mar 2013 17:16:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 11934 invoked by uid 89); 21 Mar 2013 17:16:46 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from mail-pb0-f42.google.com (HELO mail-pb0-f42.google.com) (209.85.160.42) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 17:16:43 +0000 Received: by mail-pb0-f42.google.com with SMTP id xb4so2397974pbc.15 for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 10:16:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=fds0sjacM5CXDC8svAlOcLdzviYe7Iw5iuIbZILjNYs=; b=GL9Q3L51yZFIodrVtCGha/N8A5J0EmqzGrK3m54na1PPZoO+75Xf24UjNBlWpnbYEG w9kOIsqa3GjT3FwJ4sDG3Y2mPVoncfl+RldjbCe4/lLyKdMVZxjPmTfsjqM5SKIuI38+ gabOYqZc7LOxUgMQ435TeLAslrfoJvPsMF+01qUqxAFsOCna/RAE9uCLd9XDpDbBQDWa ivIg1BSACEQKlnzNiKY11cqDRyIrRQhzU/E3QNS83P2C0skz65UjG+BEiX7SMsPomL84 kUt1gVbnXJww90OvtdKaTXqWvEMliqhnXruoSu96JFGFv+49qTz/EErPDnvK9ad9nAhm 2ynQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.170.98 with SMTP id al2mr15931525pbc.87.1363886201887; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 10:16:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.26.138 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 10:16:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130321124703.GR12913@tucnak.redhat.com> References: <20121206191401.GO2315@tucnak.redhat.com> <20130320121918.GM12913@tucnak.redhat.com> <20130321124703.GR12913@tucnak.redhat.com> Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 17:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve debug info for various cases where we drop location info on the floor (PR debug/55608) From: Cary Coutant To: Jakub Jelinek Cc: Jason Merrill , gcc-patches , Tom Tromey Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlXHSicgLdZAr+HbEzBU1tl1Jy+R1HBVnPiNv3BC/3ZHuCwDy/PyQo9ttYHXfgss13rgK5vV9XEn3siV4N3t3xquRa2HWacJ0CbEVcyzIfXlDQdqcsAyn8CwVncnU4pUSVAmCNFRYbL5W8zsftH4HNibffvwGcV78SPeEXWlE7vvFKNBxoLYZvgHBRDWpfytXb/hzAh X-SW-Source: 2013-03/txt/msg00821.txt.bz2 On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 5:47 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux again, tested also on > the testcase from the PR (gdb apparently still hasn't been fixed so its > issues are still there, but the output looks good from gcc and at least > about half of the cases handles gdb right or partly right; what gdb doesn't > handle (prints ) is DW_OP_GNU_implicit_pointer to DIE with > DW_AT_const_value, and it would be nice if it was able to print implicit > pointer arrays or strings rather than just individual array entries or > characters). > > Ok for trunk? Thanks, this is OK. -cary