From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14617 invoked by alias); 22 Jul 2011 20:33:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 14608 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Jul 2011 20:33:47 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-ww0-f51.google.com (HELO mail-ww0-f51.google.com) (74.125.82.51) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 20:33:33 +0000 Received: by wwj26 with SMTP id 26so2387520wwj.8 for ; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 13:33:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.208.197 with SMTP id gd5mr1678622wbb.22.1311366812121; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 13:33:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.207.140 with HTTP; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 13:33:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E28BFB1.8020802@redhat.com> References: <4E289782.4040702@redhat.com> <4E28A40E.3060302@redhat.com> <4E28BFB1.8020802@redhat.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 21:21:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC, cfg/dataflow] Properly split EH edges for -freorder-blocks-and-partition To: Richard Henderson Cc: Steven Bosscher , GCC Patches , rguenther@suse.de, bernds@codesourcery.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-07/txt/msg02008.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 02:09, Richard Henderson wrote: > I should mention here that I suspect the Cleanest solution is > to make DF_DEFER_INSN_RESCAN imply that we also shouldn't grab > data from the blocks those new insns are in either. =A0In this > way one can create the block, link it up properly, and have > everything Just Work later, when deferred insns are processed. Yes, this also seems like the right approach. I'll try to find some time. I guess with this in place the rest of the patch should also Just Work? :) Paolo