From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <amker.cheng@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-ej1-x630.google.com (mail-ej1-x630.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::630])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13ADE3858002
 for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 07:01:42 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 13ADE3858002
Received: by mail-ej1-x630.google.com with SMTP id hr1so6926267ejc.1
 for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 00:01:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=pUM83OWb4T+QLOgoboBJEEE3Sbz2z8MnaEOX8OonFiI=;
 b=aZ5mZm7n51/chdWcclQ+0ckOuiZ0PVEARsOoOhkdNwY5OwWMW8g5EJROMWkc6IP6uX
 c3yyShXYEQ7eI/ui7cYibTBlsEs993WV1W+FGzb0vG27HYDv42rHYBlFa7NOkNknWe33
 UvDYvcvRmLQ8+W+5CHQ/DlLIZn3uZAVmD2DvdhRMAykO0CFjPG+8oBvNajzRVmBrJJ8t
 JrDqqoJTMGhHo6ka0WmAMgoZDoh2o6d3RbbNCbhs73A2ezmHOl/9iUUoBPSC+TflSaFs
 rk/rY6RKa9eg88Q74T07VzmRe63TPE4hV1TuTYpRoyNw39jVd4YYNUn0YloV29lYfdzg
 mokw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532vjLPqRsuk4BGMRLTC2Yc0rvF4iyuRwB3eiVOd2msbzFb2buVR
 TLGcraCgAWvtmm5p+ImGe9N+BghEf2xlWRlrwYAAQCTo
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx++9lq3umwPAG9raxU0Nr21+qwbLNYJikCKMfjM4IwvRW1THeiTZHBqc08FUr5USEKhlPGHM3TzWplLc3DJ6s=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:31cb:: with SMTP id
 f11mr42999661ejf.379.1626937300946; 
 Thu, 22 Jul 2021 00:01:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <b4d9aa23-d36c-4869-818c-c76a3db53392.bin.cheng@linux.alibaba.com>
In-Reply-To: <b4d9aa23-d36c-4869-818c-c76a3db53392.bin.cheng@linux.alibaba.com>
From: "Bin.Cheng" <amker.cheng@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 15:01:30 +0800
Message-ID: <CAHFci2-2J-TAXksvjv1wPrKqugaFc3U-R_b+F0zBu6xiL6O+qg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 0001-Don-t-skip-prologue-instructions-as-it-could-affect-.patch
To: "bin.cheng" <bin.cheng@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,
 DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
 SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-patches>,
 <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-patches>,
 <mailto:gcc-patches-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 07:01:43 -0000

Gentle ping.  Any suggestions would be appreciated.

Thanks,
bin

On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 5:15 PM bin.cheng via Gcc-patches
<gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I ran into a wrong code bug in code with deep template instantiation when working on sdx::simd.
> The root cause as described in commit summary is we skip prologue insns in init_alias_analysis.
> This simple patch fixes the issue, however, it's hard to reduce a case because of heavy use of
> templates.
> Bootstrap and test on x86_64, is it OK?
>
> Thanks,
> bin