From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 46643 invoked by alias); 20 Oct 2016 14:56:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 46632 invoked by uid 89); 20 Oct 2016 14:56:05 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Ciao, Hx-languages-length:2408, our, ball X-HELO: mail-vk0-f41.google.com Received: from mail-vk0-f41.google.com (HELO mail-vk0-f41.google.com) (209.85.213.41) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 14:55:55 +0000 Received: by mail-vk0-f41.google.com with SMTP id 2so76155668vkb.3 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 07:55:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=5BzlrZFY2hVonL99IgMuQrXdRw0ED+Kus4zNsbaD+EA=; b=IZ2vCVWKPDEgWL95YKnIdVEYMwvEC6KKE9wDkbXh3VJGgYLL94/Vc55U08ZGOMllTO OqZ1hob0v87g9CcfYbxQvaDAkOBK8ug4zAbeTcbL8c7WFCX/MBKDGqZ/2eC0/jzBtIy7 Aqg25KfpjRmP2R/Nd3KpXkofLnAfwJpz0lBZqvb7eLcmTD7Z9tYcmrTzsV3VrYRxEYZS zeJOBR15rJqFBcynYG/+Famj+AcyK0aVUexYJC2EXfxIntZAc7HDd4Cc/n2WoQ/Jv6Xq R9HpQzlDgw57YoXE13VaH72nOEphLL+B6Yv7eZn8Px+z9JkcZaaoWGaNjxpCZsZsfsMa tQ6Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RnFFU4Cex9lxC3HQb6LYmGgYEjnyV3wR5Nb0qleP2a1cUlgW2k2mBgDjd5P8qXdFeNZyD78sOBpYVVsHg== X-Received: by 10.31.234.194 with SMTP id i185mr1478237vkh.127.1476975353720; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 07:55:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.116.13 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Oct 2016 07:55:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <5645083A.5070607@redhat.com> <564A6648.6000002@redhat.com> <565E25E7.7050202@redhat.com> <5662987C.9080500@redhat.com> From: "Bin.Cheng" Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 14:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Gimple loop splitting v2 To: Michael Matz Cc: Jeff Law , gcc-patches List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-10/txt/msg01658.txt.bz2 On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Michael Matz wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, 5 Dec 2015, Jeff Law wrote: > >> Nit. I don't think you want a comma after "so". And it looks like your >> comment got truncated as well. >> >> With the comment above fixed, this is fine for the trunk. > > I'm terribly sorry to have dropped the ball here, but I've committed this > now after not even a year ;-/ (r241374) Obviously after rebootstrapping > with all,ada languages. I also did some benchmark run which should be > taken with a grain of salt as the machine had fairly variant results but > the improvements are real, though perhaps not always in that range (it's a > normal three repeats run). I'm really curious if our automatic tester can > pick up similar improvements, because if so, it's extreme (5 to 15 percent > in some benchmarks) and we can brag about it for GCC 7 ;-) This is nice, thanks for doing it. I will check the improvement on AArch64. Thanks, bin > > 400.perlbench 9770 519 18.8 * 9770 508 19.2 * > 401.bzip2 9650 668 14.5 * 9650 666 14.5 * > 403.gcc 8050 455 17.7 * 8050 432 18.6 * > 429.mcf 9120 477 19.1 * 9120 467 19.5 * > 445.gobmk 10490 643 16.3 * 10490 644 16.3 * > 456.hmmer 9330 641 14.6 * 9330 614 15.2 * > 458.sjeng 12100 784 15.4 * 12100 762 15.9 * > 462.libquantum 20720 605 34.2 * 20720 600 34.5 * > 464.h264ref 22130 969 22.8 * 22130 969 22.8 * > 471.omnetpp 6250 438 14.3 * 6250 358 17.5 * > 473.astar 7020 494 14.2 * 7020 492 14.3 * > 483.xalancbmk 6900 342 20.2 * 6900 336 20.6 * > Est. SPECint(R)_base2006 17.9 > Est. SPECint2006 18.5 > > 410.bwaves 13590 563 24.1 * 13590 506 26.9 * > 416.gamess NR NR > 433.milc 9180 375 24.5 * 9180 349 26.3 * > 434.zeusmp 9100 433 21.0 * 9100 423 21.5 * > 435.gromacs 7140 402 17.7 * 7140 411 17.4 * > 436.cactusADM 11950 486 24.6 * 11950 486 24.6 * > 437.leslie3d 9400 421 22.4 * 9400 419 22.4 * > 444.namd 8020 520 15.4 * 8020 520 15.4 * > 447.dealII NR NR > 450.soplex 8340 393 21.2 * 8340 391 21.3 * > 453.povray 5320 277 19.2 * 5320 278 19.1 * > 454.calculix 8250 453 18.2 * 8250 460 17.9 * > 459.GemsFDTD 10610 542 19.6 * 10610 537 19.8 * > 465.tonto 9840 492 20.0 * 9840 491 20.0 * > 470.lbm 13740 466 29.5 * 13740 430 32.0 * > 481.wrf 11170 492 22.7 * 11170 457 24.4 * > 482.sphinx3 19490 659 29.6 * 19490 655 29.8 * > Est. SPECfp(R)_base2006 21.6 > Est. SPECfp2006 22.1 > > > Ciao, > Michael.