From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 94224 invoked by alias); 17 Dec 2015 12:22:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 94204 invoked by uid 89); 17 Dec 2015 12:22:09 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=jumped, suspicious, HTo:D*washington.edu, (unknown) X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mail-io0-f173.google.com Received: from mail-io0-f173.google.com (HELO mail-io0-f173.google.com) (209.85.223.173) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 12:22:08 +0000 Received: by mail-io0-f173.google.com with SMTP id e126so52983232ioa.1; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 04:22:08 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.138.15 with SMTP id m15mr21239930iod.40.1450354926589; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 04:22:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.107.147.6 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 04:22:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20151202220032.GA57807@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20150429075505.GA21015@physik.fu-berlin.de> <20151126165109.GA69466@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20151202220032.GA57807@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 12:22:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Fortran, Patch] (RFC, Coarray) Implement TS18508's EVENTS From: Alessandro Fanfarillo To: Steve Kargl Cc: Tobias Burnus , gcc-patches , gfortran Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-12/txt/msg01752.txt.bz2 Hi, I've noticed that this patch has been applied only on trunk and not on the gcc-5-branch. Is it a problem to include EVENTS in gcc-5? 2015-12-02 23:00 GMT+01:00 Steve Kargl : > Committed as revision 231208. > > Alessandro, Tobias, is this a candidate for a commit to > the 5-branch when it is re-opened? > > -- > steve > > On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 03:16:05PM +0100, Alessandro Fanfarillo wrote: >> *PING* >> >> 2015-11-26 17:51 GMT+01:00 Steve Kargl : >> > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 06:24:49PM +0100, Alessandro Fanfarillo wrote: >> >> Dear all, >> >> >> >> in attachment the previous patch compatible with the current trunk. >> >> The patch also includes the changes introduced in the latest TS 18508. >> >> >> >> Built and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. >> >> >> >> PS: I will add the test cases in a different patch. >> >> >> > >> > I have now built and regression tested the patch on >> > x86_64-*-freebsd and i386-*-freebsd. There were no >> > regressions. In reading through the patch, nothing >> > jumped out at me as suspicious/wrong. Tobias, this >> > is OK to commit. If you don't committed by Sunday, >> > I'll do it for you. >> > >> > -- >> > steve > > -- > Steve