Oh OK, thanks for the clarification.

Costas

On Wed, 7 Jun 2023 at 13:59, Jeff Law <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On 6/7/23 04:21, Costas Argyris via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > I saw this while working on something else:
> >
> > pex_unix_cleanup signature doesn't always match the
> > body of the function in terms of ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED.
> > If the conditional code in the body is compiled, then
> > ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED isn't correct.
> >
> > This change makes it always match, thereby making it
> > a bit cleaner IMO.
> ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED is meant to be a "maybe unused" decoration.   I'd just
> leave it as-is.
>
> jeff
>