From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-400136-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 16883 invoked by alias); 9 Jun 2015 13:30:38 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 16866 invoked by uid 89); 9 Jun 2015 13:30:37 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-wi0-f175.google.com
Received: from mail-wi0-f175.google.com (HELO mail-wi0-f175.google.com) (209.85.212.175) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 09 Jun 2015 13:30:36 +0000
Received: by wiga1 with SMTP id a1so17261586wig.0        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Tue, 09 Jun 2015 06:30:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date         :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;        bh=qETwm9gcY5ZxYFIn6wTC6V4DqduXDYLFiwY7sNRmGL4=;        b=VErB/C/g40B2i4LCzZJIky+6wyBHC/f8bwsmRVPsz3/QEHSqtdbo9DBD0KzEqNOR9i         T2F4cDTTN2xYXNag9TfWipjUcZHS04KAT+yZXDKlfXzk0jUcVCnRHpqwb7O+TJf9Ej5y         ROiiS0UyqfJwerAGQYav2EKql3jWqpgmP2f33JB8EoWLswyc6gV422lMl0dnK7jX/mhL         bL1TMqEOasANXRzOoV/OcfvSATYr+yJRo5asIYMp7wKx5cFC0fHu0VTU2sNmAHbt7k8L         h6P62kzWPyZAq+BpzHCg+upBpJFo8LPMFPxP3PGeqTNSGCKNRHHvA52LUbrunIWHxyWs         nYVQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkVikBKgED0lzE1EvEov2BxNdbr1l22U6g5UhDXhNesAWbin7c9mPWlqzDojNhgya4AAASE
X-Received: by 10.180.36.51 with SMTP id n19mr8377692wij.20.1433856633847; Tue, 09 Jun 2015 06:30:33 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.194.86.138 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Jun 2015 06:30:13 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAFiYyc3cJNiyZMufB+1_cn-c0ATd3MD4J+TiRPx5w-=EL9J6yQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <5576E606.1060407@suse.cz> <CAFiYyc3cJNiyZMufB+1_cn-c0ATd3MD4J+TiRPx5w-=EL9J6yQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?xLBzbWFpbCBEw7ZubWV6?= <ismail@donmez.ws>
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2015 13:35:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAJ1KOAh9epZzOJEg=CzAYkonHOx+XWykXih_B0OZd=kgTLSG0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix PR bootstrap/66471
To: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Martin_Li=C5=A1ka?= <mliska@suse.cz>, 	GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-SW-Source: 2015-06/txt/msg00671.txt.bz2

Hi,

On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 4:28 PM, Richard Biener
<richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Martin Li=C5=A1ka <mliska@suse.cz> wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> Following patch renames an enum values so that they do not clash with a =
MinGW reserved keyword.
>
> Reserved keyword as in a #define?  Thus simply #undef it in system.h?

No, wingdi.h has the following

  typedef struct tagBITMAP {
    LONG bmType;
    LONG bmWidth;
    LONG bmHeight;
    LONG bmWidthBytes;
    WORD bmPlanes;
    WORD bmBitsPixel;
    LPVOID bmBits;
  } BITMAP,*PBITMAP,*NPBITMAP,*LPBITMAP;