From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-395106-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 107837 invoked by alias); 14 Apr 2015 08:35:09 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 107812 invoked by uid 89); 14 Apr 2015 08:35:09 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-qk0-f171.google.com
Received: from mail-qk0-f171.google.com (HELO mail-qk0-f171.google.com) (209.85.220.171) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 08:35:03 +0000
Received: by qku63 with SMTP id 63so5873300qku.3        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 01:35:01 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.55.16.140 with SMTP id 12mr37030243qkq.39.1429000501778; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 01:35:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.140.93.183 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 01:35:01 -0700 (PDT)
Reply-To: ramrad01@arm.com
In-Reply-To: <20150414083347.GH1725@tucnak.redhat.com>
References: <5523F167.3010606@redhat.com>	<20150407155143.GK19273@tucnak.redhat.com>	<CAD57uCcf_5zj=_P_ASkF34ZMVBusVbN7bEz_9aP-ir3qx7Ocdg@mail.gmail.com>	<20150407193339.GN19273@tucnak.redhat.com>	<CAD57uCeGZJpxUTUm3BP38mStFNs0q2Fyn-rpGtSBVYsftHB3yQ@mail.gmail.com>	<CAD57uCcwLCJttGUoLDJcfJF16di+w5F9Hp2B78fywnpaMD32UQ@mail.gmail.com>	<CAJA7tRZh968b4usdsY025jek-Va2nnw1J6aFvKGq8wKtbhOHeQ@mail.gmail.com>	<CAD57uCdgY=32LGDNGXQVOUp05poUC=RFJYxzTmXubpuFOEjCPw@mail.gmail.com>	<20150414083347.GH1725@tucnak.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 08:35:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAJA7tRZmRY3qze6E4Zg_7BoFRVTauPRwM5AKmPL_f8S0E4B0BA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: patch to fix PR65648
From: Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana.gcc@googlemail.com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Cc: Yvan Roux <yvan.roux@linaro.org>, Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov@redhat.com>, 	Terry Guo <terry.guo@arm.com>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg00646.txt.bz2

On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 9:33 AM, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 10:32:16AM +0200, Yvan Roux wrote:
>> The issue is more related to armv6 than M profile, but if it is widely
>> tested as well I can just commit the torture test if it's ok for
>> Jakub.
>
> If it is tested by enough people, just the execute.exp test is ok of course.
>
>         Jakub

Yeah the execute.exp test is fine.

Ramana