From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 94302 invoked by alias); 9 Sep 2016 11:03:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 94268 invoked by uid 89); 9 Sep 2016 11:03:26 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*Ad:U*aph, delicate, alas, Hx-spam-relays-external:209.85.161.176 X-HELO: mail-yw0-f176.google.com Received: from mail-yw0-f176.google.com (HELO mail-yw0-f176.google.com) (209.85.161.176) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Sep 2016 11:03:16 +0000 Received: by mail-yw0-f176.google.com with SMTP id j1so44676355ywb.2 for ; Fri, 09 Sep 2016 04:03:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ChyYqeN5/rZ/eYcoHsbUp/CeKWGFCBWeV5m6eLx5Avw=; b=MZHRtYeG0Bfs3MfadGHcLAes0vr2yRiRoRJZfGlC/Trctk/GKtwEb0Iwwd8p7eJhKR DGKoQiyXsSfivzBfZPpbzQUbAdfAhdC1D/oCzV5+0XO6zBHO2fwYXn3f0ZK2lNrAhD/g J2389jTfvnV1ynqUDtfIyWV+B3Axu8orue/M9DSpDwwxBpx6+MAM4u7+b0ZIfwEIdxWr UtfbDLJn2KiMlR8Fj+ix1+0Po5smBKRmlpJiEjKqpVia6eKzAKcSH4w8m3qLnkabqvux uaecEjLLz7dXBIdEn88/YBWuemj8M0bB2ls7MjV6ZgtKqgzxQKgdzYW4LEokcN6rTPq4 Tz2A== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwOWADq0TvKKifzK6vSbMuF9LmcWw96GiFfrq4RVfm6zeUexLe1if4QRHK0UnzRA7KEDlSGFjlnsl79YRcvl X-Received: by 10.129.102.193 with SMTP id a184mr2471445ywc.63.1473418994650; Fri, 09 Sep 2016 04:03:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.13.219.20 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Sep 2016 04:03:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <78f841e7-808b-58d0-7913-3ec0d19630a0@redhat.com> <68b0da2b-6f38-cde4-72a9-1cf42a629996@redhat.com> From: Ian Lance Taylor Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2016 11:47:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Delete GCJ To: Richard Biener Cc: Andrew Haley , GCC Patches , GCJ-patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-09/txt/msg00494.txt.bz2 On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 2:06 AM, Richard Biener wrote: > On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 6:17 PM, Andrew Haley wrote: >> On 05/09/16 17:15, Richard Biener wrote: >>> On September 5, 2016 5:13:06 PM GMT+02:00, Andrew Haley wrote: >>>> As discussed. I think I should ask a Global reviewer to approve this >>>> one. For obvious reasons I haven't included the diffs to the deleted >>>> gcc/java and libjava directories. The whole tree, post GCJ-deletion, >>>> is at svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcj/gcj-deletion-branch >>>> if anyone would like to try it. >>> >>> Isn't there also java specific C++ frontend parts? >> >> There certainly are, but deleting them without breaking anything else >> is going to be rather delicate. I'm trying to do this one step at a >> time, rather cautiously. > > Ok, that sounds reasonable. > > You have my approval for this first part then. Please wait until after the > GNU Cauldron to allow other global reviewers to object. I am fine with this. It seems like the right move, alas. Ian