From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-332202-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 10634 invoked by alias); 19 Nov 2012 03:18:46 -0000
Received: (qmail 10602 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Nov 2012 03:18:45 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.2 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-pb0-f47.google.com (HELO mail-pb0-f47.google.com) (209.85.160.47)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 03:18:39 +0000
Received: by mail-pb0-f47.google.com with SMTP id un1so1584200pbc.20        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 19:18:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=google.com; s=20120113;        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to         :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state;        bh=aUjgjJnsIuQJbseN2/olQwUtO6oiAQ4lT/JaA3Iw6j0=;        b=KmHlrxTP+UuPuLnN5y2PoIfZ6kADh2HTJ9tZ4yx4gmnZRKPrALnBU7jme4hnXlNUjn         8+RS44bfzsB13KQ8ZhYuuray9048bl9xpun1dGEkwu2xuiaOuySmBPp4+tV9e6pheH7E         FQfPdNGrKN4mzsxEZDXnLcu4V9QrSgs48EzRuQUe7GzWxXoXbkfcOmRu+A7XHecK468p         qMLunb1uR5bArVt9Gzo0G/OHNCr3HYkXMt5OsvuClMnrCXsQa26QxH3EVD5V5Pras/6V         mJp98aEaF5aAWeoYDYW4c8GgLcsTtdeHgrraL7X2NccSs1gRVmbL8BgWvFzYXiXLuVsQ         xd9A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.66.78.97 with SMTP id a1mr32214994pax.32.1353295118307; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 19:18:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.68.54.133 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 19:18:38 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAGWvnynkSgGru8jmeUfQqAht32JLusbap5R4rNAhhWSj1AYwhw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGWvnykEHDCWmGP=+Vs1HahSqp_pfBt7+mXvYmDtsmA4rAUxDg@mail.gmail.com>	<CAD_=9DQVqL-dKGdZoL=mm6Z_6OMKXG4J+TdDHU9xFJx01eiCJQ@mail.gmail.com>	<CAGWvnynkSgGru8jmeUfQqAht32JLusbap5R4rNAhhWSj1AYwhw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 03:18:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAKOQZ8wEWyu5gpT2oa7BxXDhU0hUUCiwx0enZ5J0SOqwnSZ2QA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: VEC re-write [patch 01/25]
From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
To: David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>
Cc: Diego Novillo <dnovillo@google.com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQltxmVHiL+Qu3fG8ZtIoo59TOlZleEC35qmgI1azaqjDt677dgKDCNCHiHpfJ2FspvEff3w8nJlvPJP2pHASX/MXpj4/uU15Xw3IUQqYZ90m0eGXJcO7EQFwVewK2Dsy36t7e5YlkIMFkhtbW0IyS2azzP3yHBjCZVw0gLfLjPGeyvaDCrpGLT/87sxwzIEvB679Mpa
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg01524.txt.bz2

On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 5:14 PM, David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The problem is AIX stdlib.h defines
>
> #define vec_free free

Ouch.

> I am not sure where
>
> #undef vec_free
>
> should be placed.  In vec.h or system.h?

I think system.h.

Ian