From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-333160-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 14904 invoked by alias); 29 Nov 2012 18:33:16 -0000
Received: (qmail 14891 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Nov 2012 18:33:15 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.2 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-ie0-f175.google.com (HELO mail-ie0-f175.google.com) (209.85.223.175)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 18:32:42 +0000
Received: by mail-ie0-f175.google.com with SMTP id qd14so17568238ieb.20        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 10:32:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=google.com; s=20120113;        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to         :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state;        bh=gtsa2hye9GHbMVgDuQJTOyhxqwoK9SILR4FzxarCel8=;        b=ewRhlre2IPgeZKFoxRLXO+gJxLatI3g6X8OhPDktTs6+H80T2YMozShEYZy9GzX8nn         /IUWmAwNK7k4qEEUXratS9/J5EFZKeLjF9YDSgOvF4tjqOYiJ5wZBYSrBVf6pnhhR/is         n6msFJm8xCeG3WAJGFQJA5VzAJV3TnTQWfhxzuyvG32TRzGYcqRYYqBWngl44tgARFfz         kJleMoz++SYY3Me6rHBT/0+AmDA3jQkQ7NuiNxE1hQGCs62VTaPibDpIWtnoWPZSq7pJ         TJ2roCCuGO816Q4ieeIZW5ibZfR67mMdCmZnG3e/C6cvEdtsZWq5ys6UlHNRQAhzHhLt         0Zxw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.42.212.8 with SMTP id gq8mr20781833icb.48.1354213961762; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 10:32:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.64.15.195 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 10:32:41 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAEwic4YMtFqUzTSjw3H9oVP33D09X6MNfeUzUONU2hdJWbLy=Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAEwic4Zz43j6U90a_bBks7P1-79Yu3PqyxxRqF2tVQzK5LRVvw@mail.gmail.com>	<CAKOQZ8x=wVy39K=ZPoy5rFsnazrHP8kAb8DSVCCuR6cAB7C-Mw@mail.gmail.com>	<CAEwic4YMtFqUzTSjw3H9oVP33D09X6MNfeUzUONU2hdJWbLy=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 18:33:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAKOQZ8x4USvXXR5RZWT=HpDv8QgeBwYNxSWopB8xvG5h0SmbCg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [patch prefix.c]: 4 of 7 Fix of PR target/53912 bootstrap fails using default c++ mode in stage 2 and 3 for native x86_64-w64-mingw32
From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
To: Kai Tietz <ktietz70@googlemail.com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnPzBSUgXpVhmYOg3+kNvyT7LP1zCRuvpB4OAsTC4dHSLEg3jdXOt3elwjwY9ANUKO0l/IGpYSkDvy/O6IuGplKx61TwXs4eahzM7tolz97dDnsgHWuA86aqebdxxwimcbzeAIm0F08t9pcdgd+nujXwIcZTfIknUOVBLD1dnEt9hZ2+9J0UJuRabz7v9vJa6gqDqcj
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg02482.txt.bz2

On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Kai Tietz <ktietz70@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Fine.  Tested patch using XNEWVEC/XRESIZEVEC for this.  Ok for apply?

This is OK with a ChangeLog entry.

Thanks.

Ian

> Index: prefix.c
> ===================================================================
> --- prefix.c    (Revision 193939)
> +++ prefix.c    (Arbeitskopie)
> @@ -157,12 +157,12 @@ lookup_key (char *key)
>      }
>
>    size = 32;
> -  dst = xmalloc (size);
> +  dst = XNEWVEC (char, size);
>
>    res = RegQueryValueExA (reg_key, key, 0, &type, (LPBYTE) dst, &size);
>    if (res == ERROR_MORE_DATA && type == REG_SZ)
>      {
> -      dst = xrealloc (dst, size);
> +      dst = XRESIZEVEC (char, dst, size);
>        res = RegQueryValueExA (reg_key, key, 0, &type, (LPBYTE) dst, &size);
>      }