From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-491811-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 130836 invoked by alias); 6 Dec 2018 18:04:27 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 130798 invoked by uid 89); 6 Dec 2018 18:04:25 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-9.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:190, H*i:sk:2f4c983, H*f:sk:2f4c983
X-HELO: mail-yb1-f171.google.com
Received: from mail-yb1-f171.google.com (HELO mail-yb1-f171.google.com) (209.85.219.171) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Dec 2018 18:04:24 +0000
Received: by mail-yb1-f171.google.com with SMTP id l126so1107116ybf.13        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Thu, 06 Dec 2018 10:04:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=google.com; s=20161025;        h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to         :cc;        bh=+b5pwkhPvc+OfwbXCySddx6eEDK2aqp9sfFsulYiOS8=;        b=M47p3wg9FsSIzif7EtQIY5WnrV0/DEvE/b8lj/AZEQHOq+dtzkuIBsaLYgEAdyChL/         jPgKAq+cLBiUJneWUTzeLGkg10ixBfbBrvt2B/6tNKrJUeXeXMr7hAYEZi8Z4q2+xeuU         jXHzrOgNMOz4zYdOhH8spY33cRQqHYi86XgdjVVrnmNHOFvl/pGDwmXXZDhyBBQDRZ5r         /mTBAB9ypClNteu8HV5KAkN0il2NJAO0NKNRXgw6tbywpIPXMwQe6XhmBBWZKTFtFiJ+         We3RYMtYG46FKPtXn8YSoLEOxmg11XG5lMi0KAJncC57i9K0Y61NpBrGSzPLyk35OyxB         Wg5w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <87muprdko7.fsf@redhat.com> <20181130084211.GX12380@tucnak> <173817ca-0aa0-e1a2-6725-37e079ead545@redhat.com> <m3woousm8n.fsf@pepe.airs.com> <20181130140330.GA12380@tucnak> <fa1abe9c-7545-6a48-cbf0-97b993345523@redhat.com> <CAFiYyc1gTSXgSiJSFKEWaE0UTGbi45-mWHKJnUb4Wvjp86bbFQ@mail.gmail.com> <460cb971-0e21-1e3e-4920-8b3ee7290cf7@redhat.com> <CAKOQZ8zspME4gzoRw4xgFcShoqeUfp_e=Og=4S-yKn4EehokeA@mail.gmail.com> <736e8303-b724-f96d-54f5-46bff99fa34d@redhat.com> <57d33aa7-4e37-a09c-4bdc-974b5f654d33@redhat.com> <c7c959ca-b8bf-bd3e-a65d-bb274a3118d3@redhat.com> <fca558b7-9ed3-76d0-176c-03f64790e3f1@redhat.com> <2f4c983b-494f-93ba-d6c6-1fe0a9730a76@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <2f4c983b-494f-93ba-d6c6-1fe0a9730a76@redhat.com>
From: "Ian Lance Taylor via gcc-patches" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Reply-To: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2018 18:04:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAKOQZ8y=B6beozokJ2tdAAkVDVue08ogehMP7TAXvrPzdz9MuQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: RFA/RFC: Add stack recursion limit to libiberty's demangler [v5]
To: Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>
Cc: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>, Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com>, 	Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>, matz@gcc.gnu.org, sgayou@redhat.com, 	Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, 	Binutils <binutils@sourceware.org>, Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2018-12/txt/msg00385.txt.bz2

On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 3:12 AM Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>   Is the patch OK with you ?

Yes, thanks.

Ian