From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 80970 invoked by alias); 11 Aug 2015 04:53:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 80941 invoked by uid 89); 11 Aug 2015 04:53:19 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-la0-f41.google.com Received: from mail-la0-f41.google.com (HELO mail-la0-f41.google.com) (209.85.215.41) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 11 Aug 2015 04:53:18 +0000 Received: by labd1 with SMTP id d1so50978942lab.1 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 21:53:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.160.42 with SMTP id xh10mr24243940lbb.88.1439268794845; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 21:53:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.50.206 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 21:53:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <55C8BFC3.3030603@redhat.com> References: <20150723203112.GB27818@gate.crashing.org> <20150810082355.GA31149@arm.com> <55C8BFC3.3030603@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 04:53:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PR64164] drop copyrename, integrate into expand From: Patrick Marlier To: Alexandre Oliva Cc: Jeff Law , James Greenhalgh , "H.J. Lu" , Segher Boessenkool , Richard Biener , GCC Patches , Christophe Lyon , David Edelsohn , Eric Botcazou Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-08/txt/msg00491.txt.bz2 On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 5:14 PM, Jeff Law wrote: > On 08/10/2015 02:23 AM, James Greenhalgh wrote: >> >> On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 12:45:28AM +0100, Alexandre Oliva wrote: >>> >>> On Jul 30, 2015, "H.J. Lu" wrote: >>> >>>> aoliva/pr64164 is fine on x32. >>> >>> >>> Thanks. I have made a large number of changes since you tested it, >>> fixing all the reported issues and then some. Now, x86_64-linux-gnu >>> (-m64 and -m32), i686-pc-linux-gnu, powerpc64-linux-gnu and >>> powerpc64el-linux-gnu pass regstrap (r226317), and the many tens of >>> targets I cross-tested still get the same 'make all' errors that the >>> pristine tree did. >> >> >> For what it is worth, I bootstrapped and tested the consolidated patch >> on arm-none-linux-gnueabihf and aarch64-none-linux-gnu with trunk at >> r226516 over the weekend, and didn't see any new issues. > > Thanks -- I know it's been a long road on this patch. I don't think anyone > would have ever guessed fixing 64164 would be so complex. Especially as the bug reporter, I am impressed how a slight problem can lead to such a patch! ;) Thanks a lot Alexandre! I feel like I owe you something for this hard work! Feel free to ping if I can help you with something or I owe you at least a beer when you will be around Switzerland. :) -- Pat