From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-441987-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 89067 invoked by alias); 18 Nov 2016 17:23:13 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 89041 invoked by uid 89); 18 Nov 2016 17:23:13 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=
X-HELO: mail-yw0-f170.google.com
Received: from mail-yw0-f170.google.com (HELO mail-yw0-f170.google.com) (209.85.161.170) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 17:23:02 +0000
Received: by mail-yw0-f170.google.com with SMTP id r204so168135269ywb.0        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 09:23:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from         :date:message-id:subject:to:cc;        bh=tHuTqNKcuVKbW6W7GYzJHb5o8yJ8NcFYrcT+NG0G8gk=;        b=MVjMMRSdh4BhHQjbgSUBKPrlACW/h1tbeN337MC9dT07Le/mmn6TzsqPQ62NuA9jiH         TtX4LKAr6FGXZh8Wn5eKok8hXRM1sRPAJRSvyaeaEcjd0viyHCH4zIGZ6MZQHOt90vXg         5G+nj8G1+cCnqbGfDcs3ht9x63UOeQMCbnEbRYcSiIpPImuvN3/EYCzKR02bo/gv9UD5         hcUqsQsaAO6O/JIqDHdNj8+mIwHIqeKmWVdUsTlYG4I92yJ3kjTAs6YzM7P0AQ4bZIuY         ge0QteZyzSf8WVV04ouiq3TCyFU8NL4m3BiOil2mMXJ43Hc70v0PKy5pq/OpzWOyAwfy         n48Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC01YGJ/V1dwNvxzlYGMUsWK+QVhy0PLKeZ8sOvduo6yK//rcag4mGLpFdlpJn9mk1qXLkkiTrF9sDJ4VXA==
X-Received: by 10.13.229.133 with SMTP id o127mr858654ywe.36.1479489781379; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 09:23:01 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.161.130 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 09:22:21 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <yddvavlkqwt.fsf@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
References: <ydd7f8awce3.fsf@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> <5D0F34A7-12A8-4DEC-915A-4BE37CFD76A1@comcast.net> <CAKRnqNJvcs-Wq4z9DLb=VxZOE4TrDBY2g2KLYT=QZrfbNz0nBg@mail.gmail.com> <yddvavlkqwt.fsf@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
From: Bruce Korb <bkorb@gnu.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 17:23:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAKRnqNJYfYP-CciYQ+4dOGkm2EEhdGyYaC1Rg1fu_2AvdXw=ZA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [fixincludes] Fix macOS 10.12 <AvailabilityInternal.h> and <os/trace.h> (PR sanitizer/78267)
To: Rainer Orth <ro@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de>
Cc: Mike Stump <mikestump@comcast.net>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2016-11/txt/msg01973.txt.bz2

I think restoring bootstrap is likely a good thing.

On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 2:45 AM, Rainer Orth
<ro@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de> wrote:
>
> I guess this is ok for mainline now to restore bootstrap?